you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

You'd have a bigger impact by convincing 30% of the population to only have chicken, vs convincing 15% to go vegan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Sure, and if we could only do one, we should choose accordingly. We can do both, simultanously. Exactly like how we don't have to choose between eating less meat and driving less cars.

  • source
  • parent