1273
Impossible (media.universeodon.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/memes@lemmy.ml
83 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Impossible

@memes
h/t to @StefanThinks

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -40 points 2 years ago (3 children)

See? You just totally abdicated any responsibility to allow others to speak. Why would you be so concerned with making sure it’s only government which has that responsibility, if you didn’t hate free speech?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    responsibility to allow others to speak

    Yeah not gonna gaslight me, buddy. It's not my obligation to give anyone a platform for anything. Try again.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Responsibility can only be taken, not given. So yeah, if you say that’s not your responsibility, then it’s not your responsibility. But choosing not to adopt that responsibility does indeed make you a hater of free speech.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I guess I hate free speech, too, because I'm blocking you now. Die mad about it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don't hate free speech. There's just nothing saying I HAVE to listen to someone spewing hate and misinformation. Especially all the hate and misinformation that's put me in danger for years because of me being queer or neurodivergent.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There’s nothing saying I HAVE to listen to someone spewing hate and misinformation

    Except for the concept of being open minded. The ethical imperative to face new information that’s not easy to process, so that you can respond to it instead of being blindsided by it.

    Free speech is a responsibility held by all members of society, to maintain those channels of communication.

    Just like a good general has a responsibility to hear emissaries of his enemy, no matter how bitterly hated that enemy is. There’s nothing that says he HAS to listen to that emissary … other than his responsibility to his troops.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Except when that is hate towards me for being queer or neurodivergent. I can and will block out hate speech towards me or other minorities that's not based in reality. There's a point where I will listen except when vitriol is spewed towards me for no reason. You're attaching a tolerance to intolerance as if we have to listen to n@!is, racists or bigots just attacking everyone else for no good reason other than fox or Trump telling them so that these minorities are some threat that they're not.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 21 points 2 years ago* (1 child)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yes, it is. It is natural to want to try and shut people up. Resisting the urge to manipulate and control others is work. We all have a responsibility toward a healthy society.

    That’s why it’s prosocial when someone steps in for a person who’s being shouted down and puts his own skin on the line to say “let him talk”.

    The fact you choose not to carry that burden doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago*

    It’s weird to have someone argue that when the context of all this is support of antisemitism.

    Of course it’s a positive to help support the voice of someone who might have theirs oppressed. But why go to such extremes to support the oppressor?

    Why do you argue that we must advocate for the oppressor? Are we not allowed the freedom to speak up against those that oppress others? Is that speech not allowed?

    You see how it’s a stupid circle of inductive reasoning that does nothing to help anyone? Bottom line is a rigid absolute, a utopia is a more destructive and stupid approach than the free speech for which you claim to advocate. Freedom isn’t possible is you tolerate intolerance.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent