▲ 176 ▼ Microsoft was blindsided by OpenAI's ouster of CEO Sam Altman (www.axios.com) submitted 2 years ago by morrowind@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world 44 comments fedilink hide all child comments Satya just released a statement https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2023/11/17/a-statement-from-microsoft-chairman-and-ceo-satya-nadella/
[–] kablammy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (4 children) How exactly does company A own shares in itself? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] subtext@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago That’s actually extremely common. It’s called share buybacks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jaycifer@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago Company A was created independently. In a sense, it owned itself. After a while Company A decided it needed capital or a close business partner. Company A told company B "We will sell you a 49% share of our company for capital and close business relations." Company B accepted. Now what happened to the other 51%? They're still with Company A, so we can say that Company A owns shares of itself. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CerealKiller01@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago There's a bit of confusion between owning a company and owning the shares. A company can buy shares of itself, but that does not grant it control of itself. Let's say Cute Puppies inc. has 200 shares (so 200 shares = 100% ownership). You and I have 50 shares each, and the rest is distributed among many other holders (we'll call them "the public"). So, we each own 25% of the company and the public collectively owns 50%. Now Cute Puppies inc. bought all shares held by the public, so it has 100 shares and we each have 50 shares. But a company can't control itself by definition (it still has the shares and can sell them, but it can't use those shares to vote, appoint directors etc.), so now we each own 50% of the company. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Very easily and it's quite common permalink fedilink source parent
[–] subtext@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago That’s actually extremely common. It’s called share buybacks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jaycifer@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago Company A was created independently. In a sense, it owned itself. After a while Company A decided it needed capital or a close business partner. Company A told company B "We will sell you a 49% share of our company for capital and close business relations." Company B accepted. Now what happened to the other 51%? They're still with Company A, so we can say that Company A owns shares of itself. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CerealKiller01@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago There's a bit of confusion between owning a company and owning the shares. A company can buy shares of itself, but that does not grant it control of itself. Let's say Cute Puppies inc. has 200 shares (so 200 shares = 100% ownership). You and I have 50 shares each, and the rest is distributed among many other holders (we'll call them "the public"). So, we each own 25% of the company and the public collectively owns 50%. Now Cute Puppies inc. bought all shares held by the public, so it has 100 shares and we each have 50 shares. But a company can't control itself by definition (it still has the shares and can sell them, but it can't use those shares to vote, appoint directors etc.), so now we each own 50% of the company. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Very easily and it's quite common permalink fedilink source parent