you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -51 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I think I get why they are actually are allowing it, they won't say why, but I get why. It might have something to do with maps. If you know what maps are then you'l understand, if you don't then there's always a chance of learning. Not like the tradition map, but it's another definition.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Map is not a thing. It’s a 4Chan attempt to lump paedos in with lgbt peoples.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm not too familiar with maps i've only herd about it like 2 times. if it's not a thing now could it become a thing a decade from now? atleast on the surface, on it's own, distant away from LGBT.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    if it’s not a thing now could it become a thing a decade from now?

    Nope. "MAPS" is in the same vein as "attack helicopter" and "bathroom rapists": it's just another attempt by bigots to invent some "evidence" that the LGBTQ+ community is actually deluded/dangerous/evil/etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I actually didn't know that much about the term. I am a dem-sexual and support LGBTQ and I wouldn't want to be associated with people avocating against LGBTQ people or any marginalized people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago*

    You know enough about 'MAP' to bring it up and pretend it's no biggie and could become a thing? Those aren't marginalized people this is a piss-poor attempt to lump Pedos with the LGBTQ crowd. Off you go

  • source
  • parent