▲ 1265 ▼ The state of the discourse. (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world 445 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago* (2 children) You're misrepresenting my position. It's, "yeah definitely shoot the terrorist, try to avoid shooting their hostages if you can." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago That isn't an option atm so just a pointless strawman being propped up. permalink fedilink source parent [–] yukichigai@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) My dude, you're arguing that a certain amount of shooting children is okay. If you can't see how this is a problem I don't know what else to say. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ethanice@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) As are you? If they don't take out the military targets, kids die. It's essentially lose lose for the civilans, but one course of action leads to bot prolonging child murder. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago Nope. Preemptive killing is not justifiable. No children are saved by the killing of these children. In fact all that is being done is assuring the next generation of terrorists. https://youtu.be/QkgPYFy7NM4?si=5OEjgnFd4beRTtkH permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago That isn't an option atm so just a pointless strawman being propped up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yukichigai@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) My dude, you're arguing that a certain amount of shooting children is okay. If you can't see how this is a problem I don't know what else to say. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ethanice@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) As are you? If they don't take out the military targets, kids die. It's essentially lose lose for the civilans, but one course of action leads to bot prolonging child murder. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago Nope. Preemptive killing is not justifiable. No children are saved by the killing of these children. In fact all that is being done is assuring the next generation of terrorists. https://youtu.be/QkgPYFy7NM4?si=5OEjgnFd4beRTtkH permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ethanice@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) As are you? If they don't take out the military targets, kids die. It's essentially lose lose for the civilans, but one course of action leads to bot prolonging child murder. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago Nope. Preemptive killing is not justifiable. No children are saved by the killing of these children. In fact all that is being done is assuring the next generation of terrorists. https://youtu.be/QkgPYFy7NM4?si=5OEjgnFd4beRTtkH permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago Nope. Preemptive killing is not justifiable. No children are saved by the killing of these children. In fact all that is being done is assuring the next generation of terrorists. https://youtu.be/QkgPYFy7NM4?si=5OEjgnFd4beRTtkH permalink fedilink source parent
