▲ 38 ▼ Column: California strikes another blow against rooftop solar (www.latimes.com) submitted 2 years ago by silence7@slrpnk.net [M] to c/climate@slrpnk.net 5 comments fedilink hide all child comments Archived copy of the article
[–] Nighed@sffa.community 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Another article here: https://www.ijpr.org/environment-energy-and-transportation/2023-11-17/california-reduces-payments-for-rooftop-solar-power-for-second-time-in-a-year It feels a lot of this will be worked around by changing how some of this is wired up? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sonori@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago Ok, so it’s better than i feared, but still really bad. The article was vague on how multi site business weee effected, but did note that any apartment common areas still have to buy at full market rate even if the apartment building has solar, as do any buildings not on the same meter. All in the name of perserving some of the highest rates in the country, becuse some providers don’t like the cut n their profits of having to pay equally to small solar providers, but also don’t want to move to the more common properly priced line acess plus useage model becuse not enough profit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sonori@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago Ok, so it’s better than i feared, but still really bad. The article was vague on how multi site business weee effected, but did note that any apartment common areas still have to buy at full market rate even if the apartment building has solar, as do any buildings not on the same meter. All in the name of perserving some of the highest rates in the country, becuse some providers don’t like the cut n their profits of having to pay equally to small solar providers, but also don’t want to move to the more common properly priced line acess plus useage model becuse not enough profit. permalink fedilink source parent