▲ 571 ▼ tiktok rule (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by daw@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Tehgingey@lemmy.ca 57 points 3 years ago (2 children) Crazy what a few feet can do to public perception permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 24 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Public perception won’t stay that way furlong permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Badtouchspez@lemm.ee 13 points 3 years ago* I have to metre my expectations with what the public will do. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Angry_Maple@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 years ago* (2 children) When I see clouds behind someone (especially in shots with angles like this), I tend to think that they are legitimate clouds unless there is obvious Photoshop. There was a very long time where natural lighting was preferred over artificial lighting for shots like this. Why would someone go through the immense effort to make artificial lighting look like natural lighting when natural lighting is already there and it's completely free? Are photoshopped clouds more normal than legitimate clouds now? Did I miss something? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Atrabiliousaurus@reddthat.com 5 points 3 years ago* I remember there was a kerfluffle about an Instagram influencer with the same clouds everywhere she went. There are filters for it apparently. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Xanvial@lemmy.one 3 points 3 years ago But, you need to go outside yo do that permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 24 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Public perception won’t stay that way furlong permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Badtouchspez@lemm.ee 13 points 3 years ago* I have to metre my expectations with what the public will do. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Badtouchspez@lemm.ee 13 points 3 years ago* I have to metre my expectations with what the public will do. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Angry_Maple@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 years ago* (2 children) When I see clouds behind someone (especially in shots with angles like this), I tend to think that they are legitimate clouds unless there is obvious Photoshop. There was a very long time where natural lighting was preferred over artificial lighting for shots like this. Why would someone go through the immense effort to make artificial lighting look like natural lighting when natural lighting is already there and it's completely free? Are photoshopped clouds more normal than legitimate clouds now? Did I miss something? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Atrabiliousaurus@reddthat.com 5 points 3 years ago* I remember there was a kerfluffle about an Instagram influencer with the same clouds everywhere she went. There are filters for it apparently. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Xanvial@lemmy.one 3 points 3 years ago But, you need to go outside yo do that permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Atrabiliousaurus@reddthat.com 5 points 3 years ago* I remember there was a kerfluffle about an Instagram influencer with the same clouds everywhere she went. There are filters for it apparently. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Xanvial@lemmy.one 3 points 3 years ago But, you need to go outside yo do that permalink fedilink source parent