221
more and more news sites are pushing for paywalls even reuters now here are some sources that don't have pay walls and Npr mentions paywall in their own new pop-up? (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* by to c/technology@lemmy.world
68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

also feel free to comment your own suggestions for news sites for tech updates that don't pay wall on the web page.

New York times - https://www.nytimes.com/section/technology abc - https://abcnews.go.com/technology

the hill - https://thehill.com/policy/technology/ BBC news - https://www.bbc.com/news/technology

while nonprofit Npr doesn't pay wall, they have a new pop up that says something along the likes of "expected a paywall not our style please donate" that the user can dismiss and continue browsing the site. https://www.npr.org/sections/technology/

Reuters use to be a good source for me untill they started pay walling after a small amount of news article reads.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] [S] -9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

true, but i'm not signing up for something I check once in a blue moon. and I suppose technically it isn't a paywall, but it could turn into to one, or it might as well be one, what else does this pop up serve, to protect the site from bots?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It’s still free to you. It’s not a paywall.

    Mind you, you’re not contributing at all to support the material you’re consuming — there are other humans trying to make a living off the stuff you want for free.

    Support things you value, otherwise they might disappear. Or worse, they introduce a true paywall.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Reuters is a bit different as a newswire, though. Their main customers are other news outlets.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    That’s fair.

    Maybe Reuters is finding that “end users” are becoming their new customers, especially in the current media climate.

    At first blush, I think it’s ok to want to track that type of impact more.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    I'd argue that it is a paywall—you're just paying in data rather than currency.

    (A lot of these can be bypassed, with varying amounts of inconvenience, by deactivating Javascript for that site.)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent