▲ 1111 ▼ Please, not again. (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Daft_ish@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml 221 comments fedilink hide all child comments Edit: good to see I woke the shills
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) under the age of 28 ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Kase@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) It makes extra sense because it includes ages 0-17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago I am still lost permalink fedilink source parent [–] rchive@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) They're assuming (probably correctly) that a lot of people under 28 won't vote, and that (probably less correctly) they'd vote Democrat if they did vote. So if Trump wins and they pass a random 28 year old on the street, they're thinking there's a good chance that person is partially responsible for Trump's win. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago Appreciate the clarification permalink fedilink source parent [+] DeepGradientAscent@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Ok that makes more sense thanks. 28 seemed very arbitrary but if the statistics say so... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kase@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) It makes extra sense because it includes ages 0-17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago I am still lost permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rchive@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) They're assuming (probably correctly) that a lot of people under 28 won't vote, and that (probably less correctly) they'd vote Democrat if they did vote. So if Trump wins and they pass a random 28 year old on the street, they're thinking there's a good chance that person is partially responsible for Trump's win. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago Appreciate the clarification permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago Appreciate the clarification permalink fedilink source parent
[+] DeepGradientAscent@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Ok that makes more sense thanks. 28 seemed very arbitrary but if the statistics say so... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Ok that makes more sense thanks. 28 seemed very arbitrary but if the statistics say so... permalink fedilink source parent