โฒ 30 โผ HyperbolaBSD (hyperbola.info) submitted 2 years ago* by Frato@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml 9 comments fedilink hide all child comments FSF approved distro (now Linux based soon with own FLOSS-BSD-kernel) Do you want to participate? (esp. BSD-kernel-dev would be very welcome ๐)
[+] Presi300@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) I think it is a very good thing to have TWO options when choosing a FSF conform distro. Yes, for a laptop linux may be the more versatile option (for now...) but on a server a BSD-distro will be pure gold. p.s. i have no problems using bsd on a laptop right now - it's a very clean and well made system and the hardware support is sufficient. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Presi300@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) BSD based systems (with the according userland) have a very clean and more minimalistic code base. In the last years Gnu/Linux systems drifted away from the ideals of the unix-style (e.g. systemd...). For an end-user-system this may be ok, but the general design of the bsd-systems is better imho. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Presi300@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) That is true. There are linux distros around with musl/busybox (alpine) and some distros without systemd. But i would really appreciate a fsf-conform distro with a fsf-conform BSD-kernel and the bsd userland - it's just a nice addition to the existing oss-os world. It is not about "this OR that" - why not have both? p.s. both runit and openrc are close enough to the unix philosophy p.s.s. yes, macos derived from openBSD and is using a sytemd-like init, but - as said - macos mainly targets end-user system... it's o'right for that - i think power users prefer os-designs closer to the unix philosophy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Presi300@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) nevermind, parabola is a great distro (with openrc version), but hyperbola will not draw dev-power from pb, because it will be a completly own breed. Yes the existing BSD's are great, but none of them are fsf conform. The effort of the hb-bsd will produce OSS that can synergize with all the projects you named. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) I think it is a very good thing to have TWO options when choosing a FSF conform distro. Yes, for a laptop linux may be the more versatile option (for now...) but on a server a BSD-distro will be pure gold. p.s. i have no problems using bsd on a laptop right now - it's a very clean and well made system and the hardware support is sufficient. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Presi300@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) BSD based systems (with the according userland) have a very clean and more minimalistic code base. In the last years Gnu/Linux systems drifted away from the ideals of the unix-style (e.g. systemd...). For an end-user-system this may be ok, but the general design of the bsd-systems is better imho. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Presi300@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) That is true. There are linux distros around with musl/busybox (alpine) and some distros without systemd. But i would really appreciate a fsf-conform distro with a fsf-conform BSD-kernel and the bsd userland - it's just a nice addition to the existing oss-os world. It is not about "this OR that" - why not have both? p.s. both runit and openrc are close enough to the unix philosophy p.s.s. yes, macos derived from openBSD and is using a sytemd-like init, but - as said - macos mainly targets end-user system... it's o'right for that - i think power users prefer os-designs closer to the unix philosophy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Presi300@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) nevermind, parabola is a great distro (with openrc version), but hyperbola will not draw dev-power from pb, because it will be a completly own breed. Yes the existing BSD's are great, but none of them are fsf conform. The effort of the hb-bsd will produce OSS that can synergize with all the projects you named. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Presi300@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) BSD based systems (with the according userland) have a very clean and more minimalistic code base. In the last years Gnu/Linux systems drifted away from the ideals of the unix-style (e.g. systemd...). For an end-user-system this may be ok, but the general design of the bsd-systems is better imho. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Presi300@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) That is true. There are linux distros around with musl/busybox (alpine) and some distros without systemd. But i would really appreciate a fsf-conform distro with a fsf-conform BSD-kernel and the bsd userland - it's just a nice addition to the existing oss-os world. It is not about "this OR that" - why not have both? p.s. both runit and openrc are close enough to the unix philosophy p.s.s. yes, macos derived from openBSD and is using a sytemd-like init, but - as said - macos mainly targets end-user system... it's o'right for that - i think power users prefer os-designs closer to the unix philosophy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Presi300@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) nevermind, parabola is a great distro (with openrc version), but hyperbola will not draw dev-power from pb, because it will be a completly own breed. Yes the existing BSD's are great, but none of them are fsf conform. The effort of the hb-bsd will produce OSS that can synergize with all the projects you named. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) BSD based systems (with the according userland) have a very clean and more minimalistic code base. In the last years Gnu/Linux systems drifted away from the ideals of the unix-style (e.g. systemd...). For an end-user-system this may be ok, but the general design of the bsd-systems is better imho. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Presi300@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) That is true. There are linux distros around with musl/busybox (alpine) and some distros without systemd. But i would really appreciate a fsf-conform distro with a fsf-conform BSD-kernel and the bsd userland - it's just a nice addition to the existing oss-os world. It is not about "this OR that" - why not have both? p.s. both runit and openrc are close enough to the unix philosophy p.s.s. yes, macos derived from openBSD and is using a sytemd-like init, but - as said - macos mainly targets end-user system... it's o'right for that - i think power users prefer os-designs closer to the unix philosophy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Presi300@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) nevermind, parabola is a great distro (with openrc version), but hyperbola will not draw dev-power from pb, because it will be a completly own breed. Yes the existing BSD's are great, but none of them are fsf conform. The effort of the hb-bsd will produce OSS that can synergize with all the projects you named. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Presi300@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) That is true. There are linux distros around with musl/busybox (alpine) and some distros without systemd. But i would really appreciate a fsf-conform distro with a fsf-conform BSD-kernel and the bsd userland - it's just a nice addition to the existing oss-os world. It is not about "this OR that" - why not have both? p.s. both runit and openrc are close enough to the unix philosophy p.s.s. yes, macos derived from openBSD and is using a sytemd-like init, but - as said - macos mainly targets end-user system... it's o'right for that - i think power users prefer os-designs closer to the unix philosophy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Presi300@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) nevermind, parabola is a great distro (with openrc version), but hyperbola will not draw dev-power from pb, because it will be a completly own breed. Yes the existing BSD's are great, but none of them are fsf conform. The effort of the hb-bsd will produce OSS that can synergize with all the projects you named. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) That is true. There are linux distros around with musl/busybox (alpine) and some distros without systemd. But i would really appreciate a fsf-conform distro with a fsf-conform BSD-kernel and the bsd userland - it's just a nice addition to the existing oss-os world. It is not about "this OR that" - why not have both? p.s. both runit and openrc are close enough to the unix philosophy p.s.s. yes, macos derived from openBSD and is using a sytemd-like init, but - as said - macos mainly targets end-user system... it's o'right for that - i think power users prefer os-designs closer to the unix philosophy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Presi300@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) nevermind, parabola is a great distro (with openrc version), but hyperbola will not draw dev-power from pb, because it will be a completly own breed. Yes the existing BSD's are great, but none of them are fsf conform. The effort of the hb-bsd will produce OSS that can synergize with all the projects you named. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Presi300@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) nevermind, parabola is a great distro (with openrc version), but hyperbola will not draw dev-power from pb, because it will be a completly own breed. Yes the existing BSD's are great, but none of them are fsf conform. The effort of the hb-bsd will produce OSS that can synergize with all the projects you named. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Frato@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) nevermind, parabola is a great distro (with openrc version), but hyperbola will not draw dev-power from pb, because it will be a completly own breed. Yes the existing BSD's are great, but none of them are fsf conform. The effort of the hb-bsd will produce OSS that can synergize with all the projects you named. permalink fedilink source parent