▲ 185 ▼ DEBATE PERVERT ALERT (lemmygrad.ml) submitted 3 years ago by muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml [M] to c/memes@lemmygrad.ml 67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 3 years ago (1 child) Tbf they do sound like they could be a Marxist now. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 35 points 3 years ago (1 child) with how much they're reading lemmygrad I'm tempted to post quotes and links to theory at the end of my comments permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 3 years ago (1 child) Just be careful with the dunks or they'll use them against us lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 20 points 3 years ago (1 child) they're going to do that anyway. it's a bad reason not to dunk. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 3 years ago (1 child) You're right, at that. I was thinking of dunks like this: Classical economy always loved to conceive social capital as a fixed magnitude of a fixed degree of efficiency. But this prejudice was first established as a dogma by the arch-Philistine, Jeremy Bentham, that insipid, pedantic, leather-tongued oracle of the ordinary bourgeois intelligence of the 19th century. Bentham is among philosophers what Martin Tupper is among poets. Both could only have been manufactured in England. Imagine if libs came along with wit like this. Unlikely, still, but is it worth the risk? (A: yes) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) ahh but see, this proves my point. theory is the highest form of dunk. cf literally anything Lenin ever wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 years ago Like this rolled into one: https://youtu.be/ORfjgE6n2Pc permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 35 points 3 years ago (1 child) with how much they're reading lemmygrad I'm tempted to post quotes and links to theory at the end of my comments permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 3 years ago (1 child) Just be careful with the dunks or they'll use them against us lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 20 points 3 years ago (1 child) they're going to do that anyway. it's a bad reason not to dunk. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 3 years ago (1 child) You're right, at that. I was thinking of dunks like this: Classical economy always loved to conceive social capital as a fixed magnitude of a fixed degree of efficiency. But this prejudice was first established as a dogma by the arch-Philistine, Jeremy Bentham, that insipid, pedantic, leather-tongued oracle of the ordinary bourgeois intelligence of the 19th century. Bentham is among philosophers what Martin Tupper is among poets. Both could only have been manufactured in England. Imagine if libs came along with wit like this. Unlikely, still, but is it worth the risk? (A: yes) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) ahh but see, this proves my point. theory is the highest form of dunk. cf literally anything Lenin ever wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 years ago Like this rolled into one: https://youtu.be/ORfjgE6n2Pc permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 3 years ago (1 child) Just be careful with the dunks or they'll use them against us lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 20 points 3 years ago (1 child) they're going to do that anyway. it's a bad reason not to dunk. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 3 years ago (1 child) You're right, at that. I was thinking of dunks like this: Classical economy always loved to conceive social capital as a fixed magnitude of a fixed degree of efficiency. But this prejudice was first established as a dogma by the arch-Philistine, Jeremy Bentham, that insipid, pedantic, leather-tongued oracle of the ordinary bourgeois intelligence of the 19th century. Bentham is among philosophers what Martin Tupper is among poets. Both could only have been manufactured in England. Imagine if libs came along with wit like this. Unlikely, still, but is it worth the risk? (A: yes) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) ahh but see, this proves my point. theory is the highest form of dunk. cf literally anything Lenin ever wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 years ago Like this rolled into one: https://youtu.be/ORfjgE6n2Pc permalink fedilink source parent
[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 20 points 3 years ago (1 child) they're going to do that anyway. it's a bad reason not to dunk. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 3 years ago (1 child) You're right, at that. I was thinking of dunks like this: Classical economy always loved to conceive social capital as a fixed magnitude of a fixed degree of efficiency. But this prejudice was first established as a dogma by the arch-Philistine, Jeremy Bentham, that insipid, pedantic, leather-tongued oracle of the ordinary bourgeois intelligence of the 19th century. Bentham is among philosophers what Martin Tupper is among poets. Both could only have been manufactured in England. Imagine if libs came along with wit like this. Unlikely, still, but is it worth the risk? (A: yes) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) ahh but see, this proves my point. theory is the highest form of dunk. cf literally anything Lenin ever wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 years ago Like this rolled into one: https://youtu.be/ORfjgE6n2Pc permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 3 years ago (1 child) You're right, at that. I was thinking of dunks like this: Classical economy always loved to conceive social capital as a fixed magnitude of a fixed degree of efficiency. But this prejudice was first established as a dogma by the arch-Philistine, Jeremy Bentham, that insipid, pedantic, leather-tongued oracle of the ordinary bourgeois intelligence of the 19th century. Bentham is among philosophers what Martin Tupper is among poets. Both could only have been manufactured in England. Imagine if libs came along with wit like this. Unlikely, still, but is it worth the risk? (A: yes) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) ahh but see, this proves my point. theory is the highest form of dunk. cf literally anything Lenin ever wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 years ago Like this rolled into one: https://youtu.be/ORfjgE6n2Pc permalink fedilink source parent
[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) ahh but see, this proves my point. theory is the highest form of dunk. cf literally anything Lenin ever wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 years ago Like this rolled into one: https://youtu.be/ORfjgE6n2Pc permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 years ago Like this rolled into one: https://youtu.be/ORfjgE6n2Pc permalink fedilink source parent