▲ 68 ▼ Systemd-Free Immutable Distro Nitrux 2.9.1 Is Out Powered by Linux Kernel 6.4 (9to5linux.com) submitted 3 years ago by shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml 12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] awwsom@beehaw.org 26 points 3 years ago (3 children) whats wrong with systemd? permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml [S] 18 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don't feel like anything is wrong with systemd, but options are apart of what makes Linux so awesome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] k_rol@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 years ago I'm pretty sure that you mean "a part of" rather than "apart of". Otherwise it sounds like you are saying options and Linux are two different things. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 17 points 3 years ago* (3 children) https://itsfoss.com/systemd-init/ As far as I know it essentially boils down to systemd doing too many things. Critics argue that systemd is too complex and monolithic, making it harder to troubleshoot. They worry about a single point of failure, as all services are managed by one daemon, and voice concerns about tight integration with the Linux kernel, which could limit portability to other systems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] yum13241@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago At least it's actually documented. permalink fedilink source parent [–] k_rol@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 years ago I appreciate your explanation. I had no idea. permalink fedilink source parent [–] awwsom@beehaw.org 2 points 3 years ago this makes sense. thank you permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cwilliams@beehaw.org 11 points 3 years ago Oh boy, here we go again... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml [S] 18 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don't feel like anything is wrong with systemd, but options are apart of what makes Linux so awesome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] k_rol@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 years ago I'm pretty sure that you mean "a part of" rather than "apart of". Otherwise it sounds like you are saying options and Linux are two different things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] k_rol@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 years ago I'm pretty sure that you mean "a part of" rather than "apart of". Otherwise it sounds like you are saying options and Linux are two different things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 17 points 3 years ago* (3 children) https://itsfoss.com/systemd-init/ As far as I know it essentially boils down to systemd doing too many things. Critics argue that systemd is too complex and monolithic, making it harder to troubleshoot. They worry about a single point of failure, as all services are managed by one daemon, and voice concerns about tight integration with the Linux kernel, which could limit portability to other systems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] yum13241@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago At least it's actually documented. permalink fedilink source parent [–] k_rol@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 years ago I appreciate your explanation. I had no idea. permalink fedilink source parent [–] awwsom@beehaw.org 2 points 3 years ago this makes sense. thank you permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yum13241@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago At least it's actually documented. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] k_rol@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 years ago I appreciate your explanation. I had no idea. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] awwsom@beehaw.org 2 points 3 years ago this makes sense. thank you permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cwilliams@beehaw.org 11 points 3 years ago Oh boy, here we go again... permalink fedilink source parent