80
China has grown more new forest cover than any nation on Earth (media.mas.to)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
74 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/mapped-30-years-of-deforestation-and-forest-growth-by-country/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] [S] -33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I love how every thread with positive news about China will have at least one chud who can't even spell CPC properly bleat about statistics from China not being reliable. Get back in your basement.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Actually it's the opposite. CPC is the actual name of the party, and CCP is the name brainwashed western idiots use for some weird reason. It's like if I started insisting spelling USA as SUA and then acting like that makes sense. Anytime somebody uses CCP they expose themselves as an utter imbecile whose opinions can be safely ignored.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Does it matter? It's a translation of a foreign Language, and hardly anyone uses the real names of countries. They are usually longer and in languages you don't speak.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah, it does matter. There is an official translation from the party and there's a made up one that edgelords in the west use for some reason.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    CCP: Chinese Communist Party

    CPC: Communist Party of China

    They are basically the same and mean exactly the same thing. I don't really see the issue.

    I don't think it's edgelords using it I think basically everyone does. It's used because it's used. You are making it sound like its an intentional psyop.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    United States of America and American United States is basically the same thing, we should just ignore what USA calls itself and use AUS instead. The question is why westerners choose to use a different name than the official one chosen by the party. Maybe you can enlighten us what the reason for doing this is.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    90% sure that is a rhetorical statement but I am going to try and answer it anyway.

    It's the same reason why a vaccume cleaner is called a hoover. A hoover is a vaccume cleaner. A vaccume cleaner is not always a hoover, yet loads of people call the floor sucker hoover no matter if the brand is a Hoover or not.

    Nobody really care if someone says "I am getting the hoover" and pulls out a Dyson. Everyone was expecting some kind of floor sucker with maybe a select few expecting an actual Hoover.

    You can ignore what the official name of the USA is. People already do that. They the USA America all the time already. AUS will be a little confusing at the start as many associate that with Australia but get enough people together to call the USA, the AUS instead and it's not going to be wrong.

    A good example of people not using the correct name of a country is the UK ain't nobody using the full name the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland are they? The initialism is wrong too it should be UKGBNI

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's a nonsensical argument to be honest. Again, nobody is calling the UK Kingdom United. All the names for UK stem from the way people of UK choose to call themselves, these aren't imposed on them from outside.

    The fact that people in the west insist on deliberately calling the party differently from the way party chooses to call itself shows an incredible amount of chauvinism.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Only thing brits get pissed off about is calling the UK England, because all the countries hate England including probably the English.

    I don't see how it's nonsensical. Makes perfect sense to me. Call the country what people know the country as. You want to call the United Kingdom, Kingdom United do it. You will obviously get raised eyebrows because you will only be the one calling it that.

    I don't really know what more I can say.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You still haven't answered the original question why westerners insist on calling CPC differently from what it officially calls itself or what the rationale for that is.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I have. You just disagree with it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    you really haven't

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    ... Then either I don't posses the words to sufficiently explain it to you or you need to rephrase the question.

    It's likely a mixture of both.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    seems to me that you don't actually have an explanation for why westerners refuse to use the name CPC which is the official name of the party

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Seems to me you won't accept any explanation except for your own. I think we are devolving into an argument.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Seems to me that you failed to provide an explanation, and refuse to acknowledge that. Clearly there's not much point continuing the discussion.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    ... Then either I don't posses the words to sufficiently explain it to you or you need to rephrase the question.

    It's likely a mixture of both.

    What do you think this means?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It means that you think you've answered the question when you very clearly haven't. Again, the reason people in the west would choose to intentionally keep misspelling the name of the party is very clear, but if you feel the need to keep doing mental gymnastics you do you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •