▲ 34 ▼ GitHub Copilot CLI now in public beta (github.blog) submitted 2 years ago by starman@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev 15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) All paid products do that that you use every day permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not on my machine. Or at least, I do everything humanly possible to limit it. Either through: Switching to FOSS alternatives Custom patches applied to proprietary binaries. Blocking network access for certain processes I don't expect everyone to become a privacy expert though. However I do believe systematic privacy is important, and that we should aim for better privacy laws to keep the intellectual property of the average user safe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I mean yeah that's why I use local models that suck completely for code completion. But why single out copilot when every single electronic device is in a permanent war for cloud capital permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago Well, the post was about copilot, so that's what my comment was about. But I agree, fck all big-tech software. If it's not produced by a non-profit as open source, then it's not worth your time. (Due to anti-consumer practices, spy-ware/telemetry or vunerabilities to worry about) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not on my machine. Or at least, I do everything humanly possible to limit it. Either through: Switching to FOSS alternatives Custom patches applied to proprietary binaries. Blocking network access for certain processes I don't expect everyone to become a privacy expert though. However I do believe systematic privacy is important, and that we should aim for better privacy laws to keep the intellectual property of the average user safe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I mean yeah that's why I use local models that suck completely for code completion. But why single out copilot when every single electronic device is in a permanent war for cloud capital permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago Well, the post was about copilot, so that's what my comment was about. But I agree, fck all big-tech software. If it's not produced by a non-profit as open source, then it's not worth your time. (Due to anti-consumer practices, spy-ware/telemetry or vunerabilities to worry about) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I mean yeah that's why I use local models that suck completely for code completion. But why single out copilot when every single electronic device is in a permanent war for cloud capital permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago Well, the post was about copilot, so that's what my comment was about. But I agree, fck all big-tech software. If it's not produced by a non-profit as open source, then it's not worth your time. (Due to anti-consumer practices, spy-ware/telemetry or vunerabilities to worry about) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago Well, the post was about copilot, so that's what my comment was about. But I agree, fck all big-tech software. If it's not produced by a non-profit as open source, then it's not worth your time. (Due to anti-consumer practices, spy-ware/telemetry or vunerabilities to worry about) permalink fedilink source parent