you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

I think if you choose to do something that puts people at a higher risk than necessary, you should be responsible for the consequences.

If you drink drive and kill someone, you can't say it was an accident. If you're doing burnouts in a crowded street and kill someone, you can't say you didn't mean it. Same with speeding. Driving a death machine puts us all at a heightened risk, and when things go wrong, there should be consequences.

The people who died in Daylesford definitely had consequences of this drivers choice. Why shouldn't the driver have consequences?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Generally you don't prosecute someone who had a medical issue while driving regardless of how large their vehicle is.

    What an utterly insane take you got here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments