▲ 166 ▼ AI bot performed insider trading and lied about its actions, study shows (www.businessinsider.nl) submitted 2 years ago by loxo@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world 29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (2 children) Almost like calling advanced algorithms "AI" is a cover permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Neato@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's autocomplete with a fancy title. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago I prefer to call it Autoassume permalink fedilink source parent [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) naw. Its just a different definition than what most people know/use. Pop culture sci fi introduces the concept of general AI- Data (star trek), R2-D2 etc (star wars), T-800 (terminator), Kryten (Red Dwarf). but in the scientific field there's a concept of narrow AI- which would be more like the idiot-savant versions of the sentient robots. they can't do anything outside of their coding etc, but they're code is complicated enough to be very good at what it does. like, chat GPT doesn't know what the words mean- but it's very good at stringing words together to create natural-seeming language. What whoever has done here, is to use the ChatGPT language model to create an AI that talks and sounds like stock broker, and trained to recognize patterns in data to generate stock tips but like... if it's sourcing data from inside sources.... that's on who ever included said sources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] meco03211@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) That was my question. Insider trading necessarily requires insider knowledge. So where'd it come from or was it just a sensationalist title? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago It's probably a sensational title but... if they were smart... they'd source it from the people crafting the prompts- people will tell AI even more things than they'd tell their priest at confession. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Taniwha420@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Kryten is on your list. Rad. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Neato@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's autocomplete with a fancy title. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago I prefer to call it Autoassume permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago I prefer to call it Autoassume permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) naw. Its just a different definition than what most people know/use. Pop culture sci fi introduces the concept of general AI- Data (star trek), R2-D2 etc (star wars), T-800 (terminator), Kryten (Red Dwarf). but in the scientific field there's a concept of narrow AI- which would be more like the idiot-savant versions of the sentient robots. they can't do anything outside of their coding etc, but they're code is complicated enough to be very good at what it does. like, chat GPT doesn't know what the words mean- but it's very good at stringing words together to create natural-seeming language. What whoever has done here, is to use the ChatGPT language model to create an AI that talks and sounds like stock broker, and trained to recognize patterns in data to generate stock tips but like... if it's sourcing data from inside sources.... that's on who ever included said sources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] meco03211@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) That was my question. Insider trading necessarily requires insider knowledge. So where'd it come from or was it just a sensationalist title? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago It's probably a sensational title but... if they were smart... they'd source it from the people crafting the prompts- people will tell AI even more things than they'd tell their priest at confession. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Taniwha420@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Kryten is on your list. Rad. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) That was my question. Insider trading necessarily requires insider knowledge. So where'd it come from or was it just a sensationalist title? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago It's probably a sensational title but... if they were smart... they'd source it from the people crafting the prompts- people will tell AI even more things than they'd tell their priest at confession. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago It's probably a sensational title but... if they were smart... they'd source it from the people crafting the prompts- people will tell AI even more things than they'd tell their priest at confession. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Taniwha420@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Kryten is on your list. Rad. permalink fedilink source parent