▲ 1442 ▼ What a difference a decade can make (startrek.website) submitted 2 years ago by Stamets@startrek.website to c/memes@lemmy.world 98 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) As opposed to geo-engineering our way into global warming like we have been? "Oh no, don't try anything! We might be too successful." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dudinax@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) Warming is bad, so cooling has to be good. Is that your logic? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) No, I'm just pointing out the fallacy in your comment that carbon emissions aren't geo-engineering or that reducing carbon emissions isn't either. Also that any actually geo-engineered solution, as per your definition, is going to be far less effective than the literal centuries of concerted effort to destroy the environment. permalink fedilink source parent [+] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dudinax@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) Warming is bad, so cooling has to be good. Is that your logic? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) No, I'm just pointing out the fallacy in your comment that carbon emissions aren't geo-engineering or that reducing carbon emissions isn't either. Also that any actually geo-engineered solution, as per your definition, is going to be far less effective than the literal centuries of concerted effort to destroy the environment. permalink fedilink source parent [+] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) No, I'm just pointing out the fallacy in your comment that carbon emissions aren't geo-engineering or that reducing carbon emissions isn't either. Also that any actually geo-engineered solution, as per your definition, is going to be far less effective than the literal centuries of concerted effort to destroy the environment. permalink fedilink source parent
