330
Max users grandfathered into $15.99 ad-free plan lose 4K, HDR next month (arstechnica.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Max users grandfathered into $15.99 ad-free plan lose 4K, HDR next month::Number of devices you can stream from simultaneously is decreasing, too.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

HDR isn't bullshit but it's a waste if you don't have a TV that supports it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    At this point I’d rather stick to my dumb 1080p tv than upgrade and get stuck with awful smart tv software and ads

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Plex supports 4k and HDR. Looks great on my OLED of which I never use it's "smart" tv functionality. I'd sooner buy physical discs than ever subscribe to another streaming service.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It's bullshit to me personally because the quality of 1080p is fine and higher quality images look good for about 1 minute and then I forget about it because I'm watching the show or movie. If it makes a big difference to you, fine, but it's as unnecessary as 3D movies to me, which I also forget about once I'm invested in the film. It feels to me like things like ever-increasing resolution and 3D are gimmicks to make up for bad programming.

    Before HDR, not even as far back as CRT TVs, just the 1080p era, was the spell ever broken because you were watching something and didn't think the image was high enough quality? Because I absolutely cannot say I ever have.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    that you're content with 1080p SDR doesn't mean higher quality video is bullshit. However I will add that as video production quality has increased to make proper high quality UHD content, that has also increased the quality of the same content in 1080p SDR (in many cases). So depending on what you watch, the 1080p SDR content might already be of such quality that you don't perceive a large difference between that and the UHD version because there isn't, not just because you're indifferent to it

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If you're fine with 1080p that's fine. Most people definitely don't notice the difference. That being said 2160p is a straightforward upgrade though, and if you have the right home theater hardware you can get a much crisper image with no compression artifacts at those higher resolutions and bitrates. If you don't notice or care about those things then you can definitely save on streaming or storage costs by sticking with 1080p.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •