Special mention to the picard maneuver and stamets. ❤️

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Unfortunately this hasn’t been done for others like Deep Space Nine and Voyager, which came after TNG’s run.

The reason for that, by the way, is that while TNG was shot on film (from which more detail could be extracted using new technology), DS9 and Voyager were at least partially mastered directly on videotape (especially the CGI effects) and thus there was no higher-quality source to pull from to begin with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Oh wow! Nice to learn the actual reason why. Directly in vhs my god lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Yeah, there's a real doughnut-hole in the '90s-2000s between when stuff was old enough to be remastered and stuff was new enough to be digital/HD to begin with. Also, I double-checked, and according to this article what I wrote before wasn't entirely accurate: apparently the raw footage is on film, but the cut and edited product only exists on video. In theory, they could go back to the raw film and re-do the entire editing process, but it would be cost-prohibitive compared to how much consumer interest in an HD remaster they expect there to be.

    There's a really good Technology Connections video on the topic, by the way.

    Finally, I'm not sure if "VHS" is strictly accurate. There are other varieties of videotape that might have been used.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments