There are alternatives, we had Bernie running twice, Marianne Williamson, Cornell West, Howie Hawkins, etc... but the Democratic party actively works against them.

Granted, out of two options, not trump is better, but it's still not good enough. If the choice was to have no food, or to have some food but still not enough.

I would still choose to have some food over no food but saying my logic is bad for saying that the options available still aren't good enough isnt particularly helpful. We can demand better while still not choosing the worst option.

"Your options in this country are someone actively enabling a genocide, or a pseudo-fascist" -> that country can burn in hell for all I care