▲ 883 ▼ It's not a paradox (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Void_Sloth@lemmy.world to c/leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com 86 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's different because the Jews weren't fascists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago I dunno man, Israel serving some real fashy vibes rn. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child) If a philosophical model leads to atrocity when it is adopted by your enemy, that model is irreparably flawed. The moral lesson from the Intolerance paradox is "you are justified in destroying those who do not agree with you". That philosophy is identical to and indistinguishable from the personal worldview of every oppressor that has ever existed. Whether the Jews were actually, objectively fascist or not is irrelevant: the German public believed them to be their enemies, and believed themselves justified in destroying their enemies. Popper's Paradox does not improve that situation; it worsens it. It gives them a sense of legitimacy for whatever actions they decide to take against their enemy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) No, the moral lesson from the intolerance paradox is "destroy intolerance". Bad people always find excuses. Do you believe in feeding the homeless? What if the Nazis fed the homeless Jews Zyklon B, would you still believe in feeding the homeless then, you genocidal freak? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago* (2 children) You're not quite grasping the concept. The entire point of Popper's Paradox is to encourage "Good" people to use the exact same excuses as the "Bad". The problem with the paradox is that nobody identifies themselves as the bad guy. You have demonstrated hostility toward me, intolerance of my viewpoint. My philosophy of "tolerance" calls for me to tolerate your speech, up until you actually call for harm against me. Your philosophy of "intolerance for the intolerant" calls for me to suppress you. Adopting your philosophical model, I should hunt you down and destroy you. Maintaining my own philosophical model, I should endeavor to tolerate your intolerant attitude and behavior. Shall I maintain my own philosophy? Or shall I adopt yours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're not quite grasping the concept. Bad people always copy good people's excuses, so that's a very lame excuse not to be good. Do you tolerate everything except the intolerant? Great, then I tolerate you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You trust bad people to realize they are bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So, bad people, thinking they are good, are going to be following your philosophy? They are going to be attacking the people they believe to be bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bad people do what they want because they don't care. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis were the bad guys. It doesn't matter how they identified themselves. They were still bad - because they didn't tolerate Jews, homosexuals, disabled people or Gypsies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis stole their eugenics policies directly from the US. What they called "Lebensraum" our ancestors called "manifest destiny". Their "Rassenschande" was cribbed from our "anti-miscegenation" laws. "Sonderweg" was "American Exceptionalism". Long before they had the Holocaust, we had the Trail of Tears. The people fighting the Nazis were performing many of the same atrocities as the Nazis. We even had our own concentration camps filled with Japanese civilians, interred simply because we deemed them a potential threat. We have been the bad guys. We will be the bad guys again. When we were the bad guys, we didn't call ourselves the bad guys, yet we subscribed to a philosophy that would later become the Paradox of Intolerance and committed uncountable atrocities against "the intolerant", who we would later determine to have been the good guys. If your philosophy leads to atrocity when adopted by your enemy, your philosophy is broken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I suppose leftists did all of those things. You're trying to convince me that because Nazis killing Jews is bad, Jews killing Nazis is bad too. That won't work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, I am not trying to convince you of anything like that. I am saying that the Nazis were only able to justify their intolerance of the Jews by subscribing to an intolerance paradox. I am saying that they were following the exact philosophy that you are promoting. I am saying that they could not justify their actions under a "tolerance" policy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. Do you think it's ok to punch a Nazi? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. That is exactly my point. You can justify your intolerance of anyone with anything you want. That's what the Paradox of Intolerance lets you do. You don't need any further justification than "I don't think they like me very much.". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago I guess we shouldn't let orphans have showers! After all, the Nazis gave people showers, and look what happened. Dingus. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago I dunno man, Israel serving some real fashy vibes rn. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child) If a philosophical model leads to atrocity when it is adopted by your enemy, that model is irreparably flawed. The moral lesson from the Intolerance paradox is "you are justified in destroying those who do not agree with you". That philosophy is identical to and indistinguishable from the personal worldview of every oppressor that has ever existed. Whether the Jews were actually, objectively fascist or not is irrelevant: the German public believed them to be their enemies, and believed themselves justified in destroying their enemies. Popper's Paradox does not improve that situation; it worsens it. It gives them a sense of legitimacy for whatever actions they decide to take against their enemy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) No, the moral lesson from the intolerance paradox is "destroy intolerance". Bad people always find excuses. Do you believe in feeding the homeless? What if the Nazis fed the homeless Jews Zyklon B, would you still believe in feeding the homeless then, you genocidal freak? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago* (2 children) You're not quite grasping the concept. The entire point of Popper's Paradox is to encourage "Good" people to use the exact same excuses as the "Bad". The problem with the paradox is that nobody identifies themselves as the bad guy. You have demonstrated hostility toward me, intolerance of my viewpoint. My philosophy of "tolerance" calls for me to tolerate your speech, up until you actually call for harm against me. Your philosophy of "intolerance for the intolerant" calls for me to suppress you. Adopting your philosophical model, I should hunt you down and destroy you. Maintaining my own philosophical model, I should endeavor to tolerate your intolerant attitude and behavior. Shall I maintain my own philosophy? Or shall I adopt yours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're not quite grasping the concept. Bad people always copy good people's excuses, so that's a very lame excuse not to be good. Do you tolerate everything except the intolerant? Great, then I tolerate you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You trust bad people to realize they are bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So, bad people, thinking they are good, are going to be following your philosophy? They are going to be attacking the people they believe to be bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bad people do what they want because they don't care. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis were the bad guys. It doesn't matter how they identified themselves. They were still bad - because they didn't tolerate Jews, homosexuals, disabled people or Gypsies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis stole their eugenics policies directly from the US. What they called "Lebensraum" our ancestors called "manifest destiny". Their "Rassenschande" was cribbed from our "anti-miscegenation" laws. "Sonderweg" was "American Exceptionalism". Long before they had the Holocaust, we had the Trail of Tears. The people fighting the Nazis were performing many of the same atrocities as the Nazis. We even had our own concentration camps filled with Japanese civilians, interred simply because we deemed them a potential threat. We have been the bad guys. We will be the bad guys again. When we were the bad guys, we didn't call ourselves the bad guys, yet we subscribed to a philosophy that would later become the Paradox of Intolerance and committed uncountable atrocities against "the intolerant", who we would later determine to have been the good guys. If your philosophy leads to atrocity when adopted by your enemy, your philosophy is broken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I suppose leftists did all of those things. You're trying to convince me that because Nazis killing Jews is bad, Jews killing Nazis is bad too. That won't work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, I am not trying to convince you of anything like that. I am saying that the Nazis were only able to justify their intolerance of the Jews by subscribing to an intolerance paradox. I am saying that they were following the exact philosophy that you are promoting. I am saying that they could not justify their actions under a "tolerance" policy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. Do you think it's ok to punch a Nazi? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. That is exactly my point. You can justify your intolerance of anyone with anything you want. That's what the Paradox of Intolerance lets you do. You don't need any further justification than "I don't think they like me very much.". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago I guess we shouldn't let orphans have showers! After all, the Nazis gave people showers, and look what happened. Dingus. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) No, the moral lesson from the intolerance paradox is "destroy intolerance". Bad people always find excuses. Do you believe in feeding the homeless? What if the Nazis fed the homeless Jews Zyklon B, would you still believe in feeding the homeless then, you genocidal freak? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago* (2 children) You're not quite grasping the concept. The entire point of Popper's Paradox is to encourage "Good" people to use the exact same excuses as the "Bad". The problem with the paradox is that nobody identifies themselves as the bad guy. You have demonstrated hostility toward me, intolerance of my viewpoint. My philosophy of "tolerance" calls for me to tolerate your speech, up until you actually call for harm against me. Your philosophy of "intolerance for the intolerant" calls for me to suppress you. Adopting your philosophical model, I should hunt you down and destroy you. Maintaining my own philosophical model, I should endeavor to tolerate your intolerant attitude and behavior. Shall I maintain my own philosophy? Or shall I adopt yours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're not quite grasping the concept. Bad people always copy good people's excuses, so that's a very lame excuse not to be good. Do you tolerate everything except the intolerant? Great, then I tolerate you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You trust bad people to realize they are bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So, bad people, thinking they are good, are going to be following your philosophy? They are going to be attacking the people they believe to be bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bad people do what they want because they don't care. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis were the bad guys. It doesn't matter how they identified themselves. They were still bad - because they didn't tolerate Jews, homosexuals, disabled people or Gypsies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis stole their eugenics policies directly from the US. What they called "Lebensraum" our ancestors called "manifest destiny". Their "Rassenschande" was cribbed from our "anti-miscegenation" laws. "Sonderweg" was "American Exceptionalism". Long before they had the Holocaust, we had the Trail of Tears. The people fighting the Nazis were performing many of the same atrocities as the Nazis. We even had our own concentration camps filled with Japanese civilians, interred simply because we deemed them a potential threat. We have been the bad guys. We will be the bad guys again. When we were the bad guys, we didn't call ourselves the bad guys, yet we subscribed to a philosophy that would later become the Paradox of Intolerance and committed uncountable atrocities against "the intolerant", who we would later determine to have been the good guys. If your philosophy leads to atrocity when adopted by your enemy, your philosophy is broken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I suppose leftists did all of those things. You're trying to convince me that because Nazis killing Jews is bad, Jews killing Nazis is bad too. That won't work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, I am not trying to convince you of anything like that. I am saying that the Nazis were only able to justify their intolerance of the Jews by subscribing to an intolerance paradox. I am saying that they were following the exact philosophy that you are promoting. I am saying that they could not justify their actions under a "tolerance" policy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. Do you think it's ok to punch a Nazi? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. That is exactly my point. You can justify your intolerance of anyone with anything you want. That's what the Paradox of Intolerance lets you do. You don't need any further justification than "I don't think they like me very much.". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago I guess we shouldn't let orphans have showers! After all, the Nazis gave people showers, and look what happened. Dingus. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago* (2 children) You're not quite grasping the concept. The entire point of Popper's Paradox is to encourage "Good" people to use the exact same excuses as the "Bad". The problem with the paradox is that nobody identifies themselves as the bad guy. You have demonstrated hostility toward me, intolerance of my viewpoint. My philosophy of "tolerance" calls for me to tolerate your speech, up until you actually call for harm against me. Your philosophy of "intolerance for the intolerant" calls for me to suppress you. Adopting your philosophical model, I should hunt you down and destroy you. Maintaining my own philosophical model, I should endeavor to tolerate your intolerant attitude and behavior. Shall I maintain my own philosophy? Or shall I adopt yours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're not quite grasping the concept. Bad people always copy good people's excuses, so that's a very lame excuse not to be good. Do you tolerate everything except the intolerant? Great, then I tolerate you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You trust bad people to realize they are bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So, bad people, thinking they are good, are going to be following your philosophy? They are going to be attacking the people they believe to be bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bad people do what they want because they don't care. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis were the bad guys. It doesn't matter how they identified themselves. They were still bad - because they didn't tolerate Jews, homosexuals, disabled people or Gypsies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis stole their eugenics policies directly from the US. What they called "Lebensraum" our ancestors called "manifest destiny". Their "Rassenschande" was cribbed from our "anti-miscegenation" laws. "Sonderweg" was "American Exceptionalism". Long before they had the Holocaust, we had the Trail of Tears. The people fighting the Nazis were performing many of the same atrocities as the Nazis. We even had our own concentration camps filled with Japanese civilians, interred simply because we deemed them a potential threat. We have been the bad guys. We will be the bad guys again. When we were the bad guys, we didn't call ourselves the bad guys, yet we subscribed to a philosophy that would later become the Paradox of Intolerance and committed uncountable atrocities against "the intolerant", who we would later determine to have been the good guys. If your philosophy leads to atrocity when adopted by your enemy, your philosophy is broken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I suppose leftists did all of those things. You're trying to convince me that because Nazis killing Jews is bad, Jews killing Nazis is bad too. That won't work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, I am not trying to convince you of anything like that. I am saying that the Nazis were only able to justify their intolerance of the Jews by subscribing to an intolerance paradox. I am saying that they were following the exact philosophy that you are promoting. I am saying that they could not justify their actions under a "tolerance" policy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. Do you think it's ok to punch a Nazi? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. That is exactly my point. You can justify your intolerance of anyone with anything you want. That's what the Paradox of Intolerance lets you do. You don't need any further justification than "I don't think they like me very much.". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago I guess we shouldn't let orphans have showers! After all, the Nazis gave people showers, and look what happened. Dingus. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're not quite grasping the concept. Bad people always copy good people's excuses, so that's a very lame excuse not to be good. Do you tolerate everything except the intolerant? Great, then I tolerate you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You trust bad people to realize they are bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So, bad people, thinking they are good, are going to be following your philosophy? They are going to be attacking the people they believe to be bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bad people do what they want because they don't care. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You trust bad people to realize they are bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So, bad people, thinking they are good, are going to be following your philosophy? They are going to be attacking the people they believe to be bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bad people do what they want because they don't care. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So, bad people, thinking they are good, are going to be following your philosophy? They are going to be attacking the people they believe to be bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bad people do what they want because they don't care. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So, bad people, thinking they are good, are going to be following your philosophy? They are going to be attacking the people they believe to be bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bad people do what they want because they don't care. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bad people do what they want because they don't care. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago You can do better. Try again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis were the bad guys. It doesn't matter how they identified themselves. They were still bad - because they didn't tolerate Jews, homosexuals, disabled people or Gypsies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis stole their eugenics policies directly from the US. What they called "Lebensraum" our ancestors called "manifest destiny". Their "Rassenschande" was cribbed from our "anti-miscegenation" laws. "Sonderweg" was "American Exceptionalism". Long before they had the Holocaust, we had the Trail of Tears. The people fighting the Nazis were performing many of the same atrocities as the Nazis. We even had our own concentration camps filled with Japanese civilians, interred simply because we deemed them a potential threat. We have been the bad guys. We will be the bad guys again. When we were the bad guys, we didn't call ourselves the bad guys, yet we subscribed to a philosophy that would later become the Paradox of Intolerance and committed uncountable atrocities against "the intolerant", who we would later determine to have been the good guys. If your philosophy leads to atrocity when adopted by your enemy, your philosophy is broken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I suppose leftists did all of those things. You're trying to convince me that because Nazis killing Jews is bad, Jews killing Nazis is bad too. That won't work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, I am not trying to convince you of anything like that. I am saying that the Nazis were only able to justify their intolerance of the Jews by subscribing to an intolerance paradox. I am saying that they were following the exact philosophy that you are promoting. I am saying that they could not justify their actions under a "tolerance" policy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. Do you think it's ok to punch a Nazi? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. That is exactly my point. You can justify your intolerance of anyone with anything you want. That's what the Paradox of Intolerance lets you do. You don't need any further justification than "I don't think they like me very much.". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago I guess we shouldn't let orphans have showers! After all, the Nazis gave people showers, and look what happened. Dingus. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis stole their eugenics policies directly from the US. What they called "Lebensraum" our ancestors called "manifest destiny". Their "Rassenschande" was cribbed from our "anti-miscegenation" laws. "Sonderweg" was "American Exceptionalism". Long before they had the Holocaust, we had the Trail of Tears. The people fighting the Nazis were performing many of the same atrocities as the Nazis. We even had our own concentration camps filled with Japanese civilians, interred simply because we deemed them a potential threat. We have been the bad guys. We will be the bad guys again. When we were the bad guys, we didn't call ourselves the bad guys, yet we subscribed to a philosophy that would later become the Paradox of Intolerance and committed uncountable atrocities against "the intolerant", who we would later determine to have been the good guys. If your philosophy leads to atrocity when adopted by your enemy, your philosophy is broken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I suppose leftists did all of those things. You're trying to convince me that because Nazis killing Jews is bad, Jews killing Nazis is bad too. That won't work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, I am not trying to convince you of anything like that. I am saying that the Nazis were only able to justify their intolerance of the Jews by subscribing to an intolerance paradox. I am saying that they were following the exact philosophy that you are promoting. I am saying that they could not justify their actions under a "tolerance" policy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. Do you think it's ok to punch a Nazi? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. That is exactly my point. You can justify your intolerance of anyone with anything you want. That's what the Paradox of Intolerance lets you do. You don't need any further justification than "I don't think they like me very much.". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago I guess we shouldn't let orphans have showers! After all, the Nazis gave people showers, and look what happened. Dingus. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I suppose leftists did all of those things. You're trying to convince me that because Nazis killing Jews is bad, Jews killing Nazis is bad too. That won't work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, I am not trying to convince you of anything like that. I am saying that the Nazis were only able to justify their intolerance of the Jews by subscribing to an intolerance paradox. I am saying that they were following the exact philosophy that you are promoting. I am saying that they could not justify their actions under a "tolerance" policy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. Do you think it's ok to punch a Nazi? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. That is exactly my point. You can justify your intolerance of anyone with anything you want. That's what the Paradox of Intolerance lets you do. You don't need any further justification than "I don't think they like me very much.". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago I guess we shouldn't let orphans have showers! After all, the Nazis gave people showers, and look what happened. Dingus. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, I am not trying to convince you of anything like that. I am saying that the Nazis were only able to justify their intolerance of the Jews by subscribing to an intolerance paradox. I am saying that they were following the exact philosophy that you are promoting. I am saying that they could not justify their actions under a "tolerance" policy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. Do you think it's ok to punch a Nazi? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. That is exactly my point. You can justify your intolerance of anyone with anything you want. That's what the Paradox of Intolerance lets you do. You don't need any further justification than "I don't think they like me very much.". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago I guess we shouldn't let orphans have showers! After all, the Nazis gave people showers, and look what happened. Dingus. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. Do you think it's ok to punch a Nazi? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. That is exactly my point. You can justify your intolerance of anyone with anything you want. That's what the Paradox of Intolerance lets you do. You don't need any further justification than "I don't think they like me very much.". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago I guess we shouldn't let orphans have showers! After all, the Nazis gave people showers, and look what happened. Dingus. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The Nazis could justify their intolerance of Jews with anything they wanted. That is exactly my point. You can justify your intolerance of anyone with anything you want. That's what the Paradox of Intolerance lets you do. You don't need any further justification than "I don't think they like me very much.". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago I guess we shouldn't let orphans have showers! After all, the Nazis gave people showers, and look what happened. Dingus. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago I guess we shouldn't let orphans have showers! After all, the Nazis gave people showers, and look what happened. Dingus. permalink fedilink source parent
