The New York Times published a pair of articles this weekend highlighting the rising number of deaths of cyclists riding electric bikes. However, in one of the most impressive feats of victim-blaming I’ve seen from the publication in some time, the NYT lays the onus on e-bikes instead of on the things killing their law abiding riders: cars.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child)

I see you've never encountered an ebike on a hill.

Acoustic bike riders rest on the downhill.

Ebike riders who have motors that exceed their power output by a factor of 3 rest on the uphill.

The rolling resistance difference is single digit watts. Any influence from extra weight will increase coasting speed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Actually, I was thinking of personal experience riding with my wife, with me on an ebike and her on an acoustic bike. I was surprised at how I actually needed to put in a little effort to keep up with her downhill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    I was surprised at how I actually needed to put in a little effort to keep up with her downhill.

    ^ precisely my point though. A little effort exceeds the motor speed limiter. Effort that is much more readily available because you didn't spend it going up the hill.

  • source
  • parent