Cases against volunteers with Food Not Bombs were dismissed on Thursday, but the city attorney said he intends to press the issue.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 3 years ago (1 child)

if you’re going to do it on public property, do it at the site we’ve set up for this purpose

From what I've seen when this was first posted on Lemmy, "the site we've set up for this purpose" was the former police headquarters. A lot of people, especially not rich people living unhoused, might not want to go onto police property, especially in a city like Houston.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 16 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago

    ...the point of the law is to stop people feeding the homeless. In their fucked up minds, if they make the city inhospitable to the people without money or resources, they'll leave. Ignoring the fact that they don't have the resources to do that. So it's basically a "if you're homeless, die quickly" law.

  • source
  • parent