you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

Bill Clinton banned assault weapons in 1994; mass shootings dropped by 43%.

George W. Bush and the GOP let the assault weapons ban expire in 2004; mass shootings increased by 245%.

These numbers tell the whole story.

https://elk.zone/mstdn.social/@Strandjunker/111301755969285547

https://www.theonion.com/no-way-to-prevent-this-says-only-nation-where-this-r-1819576527

edit:

more simply: https://www.theonion.com/no-way-to-prevent-this-says-only-nation-where-this-r-1819576527

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    That wasn't a prohibition though, I was referring to any number of actual prohibitions. Like alcohol in the 20s and such.

    There's no denying taking something built to kill away can reduce said killings and I'm very much for sane, logical gun control. However, the point is that all out prohibition is neither historically or even mathematically feasible considering there are more of them than actual Americans (another problem we have). Do you understand the nuance?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    No they didn't, because they weren't really a thing at the time...also columbine and VT happened with handguns during the AWB....it was sunset because it didn't do anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Are you refuting these stats and do you want to provide a source for that?

    Also, saying that some gun violence happened so that means gun control doesn't work is nonsense. It's like "well some died in a car crash so seat belts and airbags don't work."

    The facts on this one just aren't on your side. Looking at this either way - the US is a third world country when it comes to gun violence, and secondarily, countries with relatively little to no gun control have extreme rates of gun violence.

  • source
  • parent