โฒ 1002 โผ Well, this is something! (files.mastodon.social) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Masimatutu@lemm.ee to c/europe@feddit.de 269 comments fedilink hide all child comments Meanwhile in Germany:
[โ] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) While all power plants have a one time carbon cost to build and decommission, there is a continuous carbon cost to mining nuclear fuel. I think that's what GP was hinting at. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] nixcamic@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) Nuclear fuel lasts so long in modern reactors that it's kinda a silly point though. What you need to be looking at is lifetime carbon costs per kWh, that's the only real meaningful comparison. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Gladaed@feddit.de -2 points 2 years ago A Single tank lasting long is not necessarily a good thing. It means you have to put in the effort up front. It also does not negate the cost of fuel/W permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] nixcamic@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) Nuclear fuel lasts so long in modern reactors that it's kinda a silly point though. What you need to be looking at is lifetime carbon costs per kWh, that's the only real meaningful comparison. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Gladaed@feddit.de -2 points 2 years ago A Single tank lasting long is not necessarily a good thing. It means you have to put in the effort up front. It also does not negate the cost of fuel/W permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Gladaed@feddit.de -2 points 2 years ago A Single tank lasting long is not necessarily a good thing. It means you have to put in the effort up front. It also does not negate the cost of fuel/W permalink fedilink source parent