you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 123 points 2 years ago (4 children)

They won’t address the mental health problems of this nation because it isn’t profitable to do so.

They won’t address the gun problem of this nation because of something a slaver jotted down 200+ years ago. And guns are profitable.

They won’t address mass shootings because then you wouldn’t be living in fear of them and would have time realize how they have ruined everything in the name of profits.

America is doomed for as long as we care about profit more than people

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I would like to point out that Reagan dismantled funding for our mental health system and was responsible for the closing of many mental health treatment centers, and Republicans have (to my knowledge) voted against every effort to resurrect it.

    They won't support restrictions on gun ownership because they say the problem is mental health, but they won't support spending on mental health either. (Most likely because they seem to oppose anything that would actually help people who suffer.)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_Health_Systems_Act_of_1980

    https://sociology.org/content/vol003.004/thomas.html

    This last one is a ddg search - you can just pick which article you want to read about Republicans voting against mental health funding.

    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=republicans+vote+against+mental+health+funding

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    The Republican party really is a hollow shell occupied only by those willing to distract and harm the people rather than help them.

    That’s the politicians and donors at least. They also have a lot of useful idiots.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    They won't address the mental health problems because it's all part of a strategy to keep people scared.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Also for hospital systems it’s wildly unprofitable. You make your money in two places in medicine, elective surgeries and in the emergency department. Mental healthcare is slow, in the extreme cases you’re dealing with unpleasant patients that are hostile to the care you’re trying to provide, and you often have to house them and feed them for extended periods of time knowing they don’t have any money to reimburse you.

    That’s why the hospital I’m working at has built a multimillion dollar cardiac surgery tower (not a unit, not a few floors, an entire tower), but scrapped the plans to rebuild the aging and woefully inadequate inpatient psych facility.

    If we can’t squeeze every cent from you we will only do the bare minimum that the CMC requires from us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Making healthcare a for profit endeavour is not in the best interests of society as a whole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Capitalism should exist for non essentials only. I don't care that candy factories and stores aren't controlled by the government/its workers, but I sure as hell care that my government is trying to introduce more and more private care facilities in our healthcare system!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Because one is realistic (a system where essential needs are all nationalised but non essentials aren't, giving a place for greedy people who feel that need to make profit through their work) and the other isn't (expecting greed to disappear).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 2 years ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    No, I'm realistic, some people will always be greedy, better give them a way to satisfy themselves than have them corrupting a system that tries to eliminate them or to have them work in the black market.

    It's the same as drugs, you have better control over hard drugs users by making drugs legal, providing it and taking charge of them than you do by making it illegal and seeing them shoot themselves in an abandoned building with whatever junk they can find.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I agree with you. There’s lots of keyboard warriors with big opinions that have yet to put those opinions to the test in the real world. No, not the suburban tgi Friday’s sedan driving real world, but the gritty disgusting world of poverty and inequality. Most of us have zero concept of what that is even when we think that we do.

    We can sit around jerking each other off with wonderful ideas like total government oversight to prevent corporate overreach in all industries but that ignores the fundamental reality of the world we live in. We have to work with what we’ve got to make it work for us the best that it can. It won’t be perfect, people will always be taken advantage of and others will stop at nothing to hoard wealth and retain power, but we can usually move the needle slightly in our lifetime and raise our kids to work hard to move it a little bit more.

    We won’t see a world with some communist utopia anytime soon, capitalism isn’t going anywhere. But we can achieve victories with things like universal healthcare, universal basic income, improved access to mental health care and healthcare as a whole, and see the gun lobby reigned in so that we can finally pass common sense gun laws that will start to slowly address this madness.

    Goals need to be reasonable and attainable. Otherwise you’re likely to never get off the ground.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    That and people would still be free to create a worker owned candy factory if they wanted, they would just compete with the private candy factory, which is totally fair considering that the government has no reason to create a candy factory in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    America is doomed for as long as we care about profit more than people

    Sorry to break this to you but that's the literal back bone of your country lol. Slaves much? You still have slavery to this day!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Not actual slavery -- you can always quit your job and starve to death under a freeway overpass.

    But I think a lot of corporate America would love actual slavery. Look at the way Amazon treats warehouse workers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments