you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

If we have the tech to change people's brains in such a way, what else will it gets used on? Ethically, there's differences between pedophilia and other sexual preferences but I don't know if there's any biological differences. Given conversion camps are already a problem despite not working, I can't see how they wouldn't become a bigger problem if they did actually do what they claimed...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    We have the tech right now to shoot people dead. It's just tech, create laws about what's acceptable to do with it and what's not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Even when conversion camp stuff is illegal, people still try it. Even if just DIY abuse (which is also illegal and still common). Simply not having the tech may be preferable to having the tech/knowledge, making it illegal to use it, and then people use it illegally anyways. If child abuse in general was something that could have just not been invented, not inventing it would be far superior to inventing it and then making it illegal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    oh yeah cause that's working out oh so perfectly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    This thread is about how to regulate AI-generated child porn, that's going to require creating laws too.

    What's your proposed alternative to using laws to regulate tech?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments