▲ 1591 ▼ Kick tankies out of 196 (lemmy.blahaj.zone) submitted 2 years ago by Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone 737 comments fedilink hide all child comments Remember kids, Tankies wants to undermine democracy - same as facists.
[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 86 points 2 years ago (1 child) Jessie what the fuck are you talking about permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Deiskos@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Paradox of tolerance permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah but where the hell are we defending Nazis here LOL permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nobsi@feddit.de 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) We aren't, Tankies are. That's what the comment says. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) Now that makes sense I'm sure I'm not the only who read the patent comment as a comment directed at us rather than tankies permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nobsi@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago After commenting this i realised lots of people didnt see it. It was obvious to me. dunno. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago* (2 children) This isn't intended to be antagonistic, even though I know it seems that way in text, but do you have any links to examples of tankies defending nazis? I'm just curious to see it. If anything, on hexbear as an example, I see them claiming most everyone they don't like is/is friends with nazis. They seem to use hatred of nazis as an excuse for supporting some really fucked up shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Melpomene@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nobsi@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago No, Tankies don't defend Nazis. Tankies depend on everyone just blindly accepting a wrong definition of free speech. Tankies claim censorship whenever someone critizises them just like nazis and altrights do. While this is not directly defending nazis, this is trying to make tolerance of intolerance to be universally accepted and thus helps nazis to also use intolerance freely because silencing harmful speech will be seen as "censorship" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Deiskos@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Paradox of tolerance permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah but where the hell are we defending Nazis here LOL permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nobsi@feddit.de 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) We aren't, Tankies are. That's what the comment says. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) Now that makes sense I'm sure I'm not the only who read the patent comment as a comment directed at us rather than tankies permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nobsi@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago After commenting this i realised lots of people didnt see it. It was obvious to me. dunno. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago* (2 children) This isn't intended to be antagonistic, even though I know it seems that way in text, but do you have any links to examples of tankies defending nazis? I'm just curious to see it. If anything, on hexbear as an example, I see them claiming most everyone they don't like is/is friends with nazis. They seem to use hatred of nazis as an excuse for supporting some really fucked up shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Melpomene@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nobsi@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago No, Tankies don't defend Nazis. Tankies depend on everyone just blindly accepting a wrong definition of free speech. Tankies claim censorship whenever someone critizises them just like nazis and altrights do. While this is not directly defending nazis, this is trying to make tolerance of intolerance to be universally accepted and thus helps nazis to also use intolerance freely because silencing harmful speech will be seen as "censorship" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah but where the hell are we defending Nazis here LOL permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nobsi@feddit.de 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) We aren't, Tankies are. That's what the comment says. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) Now that makes sense I'm sure I'm not the only who read the patent comment as a comment directed at us rather than tankies permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nobsi@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago After commenting this i realised lots of people didnt see it. It was obvious to me. dunno. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago* (2 children) This isn't intended to be antagonistic, even though I know it seems that way in text, but do you have any links to examples of tankies defending nazis? I'm just curious to see it. If anything, on hexbear as an example, I see them claiming most everyone they don't like is/is friends with nazis. They seem to use hatred of nazis as an excuse for supporting some really fucked up shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Melpomene@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nobsi@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago No, Tankies don't defend Nazis. Tankies depend on everyone just blindly accepting a wrong definition of free speech. Tankies claim censorship whenever someone critizises them just like nazis and altrights do. While this is not directly defending nazis, this is trying to make tolerance of intolerance to be universally accepted and thus helps nazis to also use intolerance freely because silencing harmful speech will be seen as "censorship" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nobsi@feddit.de 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) We aren't, Tankies are. That's what the comment says. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) Now that makes sense I'm sure I'm not the only who read the patent comment as a comment directed at us rather than tankies permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nobsi@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago After commenting this i realised lots of people didnt see it. It was obvious to me. dunno. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago* (2 children) This isn't intended to be antagonistic, even though I know it seems that way in text, but do you have any links to examples of tankies defending nazis? I'm just curious to see it. If anything, on hexbear as an example, I see them claiming most everyone they don't like is/is friends with nazis. They seem to use hatred of nazis as an excuse for supporting some really fucked up shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Melpomene@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nobsi@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago No, Tankies don't defend Nazis. Tankies depend on everyone just blindly accepting a wrong definition of free speech. Tankies claim censorship whenever someone critizises them just like nazis and altrights do. While this is not directly defending nazis, this is trying to make tolerance of intolerance to be universally accepted and thus helps nazis to also use intolerance freely because silencing harmful speech will be seen as "censorship" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) Now that makes sense I'm sure I'm not the only who read the patent comment as a comment directed at us rather than tankies permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nobsi@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago After commenting this i realised lots of people didnt see it. It was obvious to me. dunno. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nobsi@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago After commenting this i realised lots of people didnt see it. It was obvious to me. dunno. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago* (2 children) This isn't intended to be antagonistic, even though I know it seems that way in text, but do you have any links to examples of tankies defending nazis? I'm just curious to see it. If anything, on hexbear as an example, I see them claiming most everyone they don't like is/is friends with nazis. They seem to use hatred of nazis as an excuse for supporting some really fucked up shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Melpomene@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nobsi@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago No, Tankies don't defend Nazis. Tankies depend on everyone just blindly accepting a wrong definition of free speech. Tankies claim censorship whenever someone critizises them just like nazis and altrights do. While this is not directly defending nazis, this is trying to make tolerance of intolerance to be universally accepted and thus helps nazis to also use intolerance freely because silencing harmful speech will be seen as "censorship" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nobsi@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago No, Tankies don't defend Nazis. Tankies depend on everyone just blindly accepting a wrong definition of free speech. Tankies claim censorship whenever someone critizises them just like nazis and altrights do. While this is not directly defending nazis, this is trying to make tolerance of intolerance to be universally accepted and thus helps nazis to also use intolerance freely because silencing harmful speech will be seen as "censorship" permalink fedilink source parent