you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 88 points 3 years ago (4 children)

Antineutrinos don't interact with almost anything. They're just a bunch of wimps. They're harmless. Neat for mapping nuclear reactors tho.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    informative but the name-calling was uncalled for

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    GenX scientists naming things. Was it a mistake? Maybe, but we’re having a laugh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Sonic the hedgehog protein has entered the chat

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    How is the map data obtained?

    Edit: Looked up the article. It seems they took known geological data and calculated the geo-antineutrino flux map based on measurements from detectors in Japan and Italy. Reactor antineutrinos are calculated from the international atomic energy agency data and assumptions on antineutrino rates.

    In short, this is just a distance-from-nuclear reactors map

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    But they don’t interact with anything so how are we detecting them I think is what he is asking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    They do interact with other stuff a little bit. It's very difficult to detect them because they hardly interact with anything, but it's not absolutely nothing so it's not impossible to detect them. This is well beyond my level of physics knowledge, but apparently one such interaction is a process called inverse beta decay. High-energy antineutrinos that crash in to protons produce a pair of particles that is much more easily detectable. A rule of physics called lepton conservation, which is about the fundamental building blocks of particles involved in a reaction not changing, makes this pair of detectable particles identifiable as being caused by an incoming antineutrino.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Could these be used to locate nuclear submarines and the like?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago*

    No. This is a map of estimated antineutrino rates generated from known data.

    Data from a theoretical detector that can calculate where its detected neutrinos came from from could be compared to this to find anomalies, but we're not there yet

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 11 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    That's a good question, but no. It was just a bit of word play.

    Antineutrinos are not WIMPs. WIMPs are weakly interacting massive particles. Antineutrinos are anything but massive, they're almost massless, so massless that they were, for the longest time, thought to be massless. They can be a product of dark matter, as speculated, but they aren't it tho.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments