▲ 6 ▼ Stack Overflow's CEO doesn't understand Stack Overflow (jlericson.com) submitted 3 years ago by outhold@lemmy.world to c/programming@programming.dev 19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Damage@feddit.it 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Doubt the CEO of Stack Overflow is a billionaire permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 years ago Shh the people are frothing at the mouth. Protect yourself and your own, grab the popcorn and enjoy the show. I think we are pretty much past rationalizing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] knoland@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago something nice Are we talking about the same stack overflow? permalink fedilink source parent [–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) His golden parachute value is tied to the stock value of the company, so of course he doesn't care about long term projections, only short term while he's still at the company for a couple years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) This perverse incentive has been brought to you by.... Capitalism! ✨ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan0@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago (3 children) Ah yes the same evil capitalism that: Allowed SO to exist in the first place Have market incentive to get anywhere near as good as they once were Do you have a better system in mind? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago* Obviously anything that succeeds in a capitalist economy succeeded because of capitalism, and anything that succeeds in a not-fully-capitalist economy does so in spite of the corrupting influence of socialism. Remember, capitalism can't fail; it can only be failed! Slash S. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dan0@programming.dev -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) Answer my original question first and you have your proof or not. If you can't answer, there's your proof. Yeah, information was freely traded before the advent of capitalism, and you're still free to walk over to your neighbor's house and ask questions about your code, but they're not going to be near the quality of a large scale service like SO. Where do you expect the resources to come from to have and serve content reliably? They don't run on hatred of capitalism, they run on money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] foo@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Stack overflow could only generate and moderate its content through collectivism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan0@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago That's true, but does your answer on SO pay the bills for running and serving the content? permalink fedilink source parent [–] rhino_hornbill@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/master/paul_cockshott_cyber_communism.md permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social -1 points 3 years ago (3 children) I have a quiz for you; Name a single successive communist country. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] RadicalKittenWanabe@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago Only if you can name a single successful capitalist country permalink fedilink source parent [–] rhino_hornbill@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Perfide@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago China is communist in name only, in practice they are the definition of State Capitalism. I also wouldn't describe a dictatorship that commits genocide as a success, in any case. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago China is successful from the capitalistic point of view, but it failed to uphold the ideals and principles of the system described in the document. The exploitation of the people is through the roof. Edit: To further explain my point: Communism is a flawed system that cannot exist in its idealistic form due to the excessive concentration of power in the state, leading to three potential outcomes: The collapse of the country. The transformation into a state capitalist system, as seen in China. The transformation into an authoritarian regime, as seen in North Korea. Communism is, in my opinion, a pipe dream because it proposes a classless, stateless society where the means of production are collectively owned and wealth is distributed equally among all members. However, in practice, historical attempts at implementing communism have faced challenges in terms of human nature, central planning inefficiencies, and lack of incentives, leading to economic stagnation, authoritarian rule, and often the collapse of the system. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -1 points 3 years ago Name a single country that actually implemented communism and wasn't undermined by the West with coups, sanctions, or outright invasion. Oh and the word you're looking for is "successful". "Successive" is not in any way a synonym. permalink fedilink source parent [+] ImpossibleRubiksCube@programming.dev -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Damage@feddit.it 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Doubt the CEO of Stack Overflow is a billionaire permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 years ago Shh the people are frothing at the mouth. Protect yourself and your own, grab the popcorn and enjoy the show. I think we are pretty much past rationalizing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 years ago Shh the people are frothing at the mouth. Protect yourself and your own, grab the popcorn and enjoy the show. I think we are pretty much past rationalizing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] knoland@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago something nice Are we talking about the same stack overflow? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) His golden parachute value is tied to the stock value of the company, so of course he doesn't care about long term projections, only short term while he's still at the company for a couple years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) This perverse incentive has been brought to you by.... Capitalism! ✨ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan0@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago (3 children) Ah yes the same evil capitalism that: Allowed SO to exist in the first place Have market incentive to get anywhere near as good as they once were Do you have a better system in mind? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago* Obviously anything that succeeds in a capitalist economy succeeded because of capitalism, and anything that succeeds in a not-fully-capitalist economy does so in spite of the corrupting influence of socialism. Remember, capitalism can't fail; it can only be failed! Slash S. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dan0@programming.dev -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) Answer my original question first and you have your proof or not. If you can't answer, there's your proof. Yeah, information was freely traded before the advent of capitalism, and you're still free to walk over to your neighbor's house and ask questions about your code, but they're not going to be near the quality of a large scale service like SO. Where do you expect the resources to come from to have and serve content reliably? They don't run on hatred of capitalism, they run on money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] foo@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Stack overflow could only generate and moderate its content through collectivism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan0@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago That's true, but does your answer on SO pay the bills for running and serving the content? permalink fedilink source parent [–] rhino_hornbill@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/master/paul_cockshott_cyber_communism.md permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social -1 points 3 years ago (3 children) I have a quiz for you; Name a single successive communist country. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] RadicalKittenWanabe@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago Only if you can name a single successful capitalist country permalink fedilink source parent [–] rhino_hornbill@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Perfide@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago China is communist in name only, in practice they are the definition of State Capitalism. I also wouldn't describe a dictatorship that commits genocide as a success, in any case. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago China is successful from the capitalistic point of view, but it failed to uphold the ideals and principles of the system described in the document. The exploitation of the people is through the roof. Edit: To further explain my point: Communism is a flawed system that cannot exist in its idealistic form due to the excessive concentration of power in the state, leading to three potential outcomes: The collapse of the country. The transformation into a state capitalist system, as seen in China. The transformation into an authoritarian regime, as seen in North Korea. Communism is, in my opinion, a pipe dream because it proposes a classless, stateless society where the means of production are collectively owned and wealth is distributed equally among all members. However, in practice, historical attempts at implementing communism have faced challenges in terms of human nature, central planning inefficiencies, and lack of incentives, leading to economic stagnation, authoritarian rule, and often the collapse of the system. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -1 points 3 years ago Name a single country that actually implemented communism and wasn't undermined by the West with coups, sanctions, or outright invasion. Oh and the word you're looking for is "successful". "Successive" is not in any way a synonym. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) This perverse incentive has been brought to you by.... Capitalism! ✨ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan0@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago (3 children) Ah yes the same evil capitalism that: Allowed SO to exist in the first place Have market incentive to get anywhere near as good as they once were Do you have a better system in mind? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago* Obviously anything that succeeds in a capitalist economy succeeded because of capitalism, and anything that succeeds in a not-fully-capitalist economy does so in spite of the corrupting influence of socialism. Remember, capitalism can't fail; it can only be failed! Slash S. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dan0@programming.dev -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) Answer my original question first and you have your proof or not. If you can't answer, there's your proof. Yeah, information was freely traded before the advent of capitalism, and you're still free to walk over to your neighbor's house and ask questions about your code, but they're not going to be near the quality of a large scale service like SO. Where do you expect the resources to come from to have and serve content reliably? They don't run on hatred of capitalism, they run on money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] foo@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Stack overflow could only generate and moderate its content through collectivism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan0@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago That's true, but does your answer on SO pay the bills for running and serving the content? permalink fedilink source parent [–] rhino_hornbill@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/master/paul_cockshott_cyber_communism.md permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social -1 points 3 years ago (3 children) I have a quiz for you; Name a single successive communist country. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] RadicalKittenWanabe@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago Only if you can name a single successful capitalist country permalink fedilink source parent [–] rhino_hornbill@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Perfide@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago China is communist in name only, in practice they are the definition of State Capitalism. I also wouldn't describe a dictatorship that commits genocide as a success, in any case. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago China is successful from the capitalistic point of view, but it failed to uphold the ideals and principles of the system described in the document. The exploitation of the people is through the roof. Edit: To further explain my point: Communism is a flawed system that cannot exist in its idealistic form due to the excessive concentration of power in the state, leading to three potential outcomes: The collapse of the country. The transformation into a state capitalist system, as seen in China. The transformation into an authoritarian regime, as seen in North Korea. Communism is, in my opinion, a pipe dream because it proposes a classless, stateless society where the means of production are collectively owned and wealth is distributed equally among all members. However, in practice, historical attempts at implementing communism have faced challenges in terms of human nature, central planning inefficiencies, and lack of incentives, leading to economic stagnation, authoritarian rule, and often the collapse of the system. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -1 points 3 years ago Name a single country that actually implemented communism and wasn't undermined by the West with coups, sanctions, or outright invasion. Oh and the word you're looking for is "successful". "Successive" is not in any way a synonym. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dan0@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago (3 children) Ah yes the same evil capitalism that: Allowed SO to exist in the first place Have market incentive to get anywhere near as good as they once were Do you have a better system in mind? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago* Obviously anything that succeeds in a capitalist economy succeeded because of capitalism, and anything that succeeds in a not-fully-capitalist economy does so in spite of the corrupting influence of socialism. Remember, capitalism can't fail; it can only be failed! Slash S. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dan0@programming.dev -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) Answer my original question first and you have your proof or not. If you can't answer, there's your proof. Yeah, information was freely traded before the advent of capitalism, and you're still free to walk over to your neighbor's house and ask questions about your code, but they're not going to be near the quality of a large scale service like SO. Where do you expect the resources to come from to have and serve content reliably? They don't run on hatred of capitalism, they run on money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] foo@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Stack overflow could only generate and moderate its content through collectivism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan0@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago That's true, but does your answer on SO pay the bills for running and serving the content? permalink fedilink source parent [–] rhino_hornbill@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/master/paul_cockshott_cyber_communism.md permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social -1 points 3 years ago (3 children) I have a quiz for you; Name a single successive communist country. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] RadicalKittenWanabe@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago Only if you can name a single successful capitalist country permalink fedilink source parent [–] rhino_hornbill@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Perfide@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago China is communist in name only, in practice they are the definition of State Capitalism. I also wouldn't describe a dictatorship that commits genocide as a success, in any case. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago China is successful from the capitalistic point of view, but it failed to uphold the ideals and principles of the system described in the document. The exploitation of the people is through the roof. Edit: To further explain my point: Communism is a flawed system that cannot exist in its idealistic form due to the excessive concentration of power in the state, leading to three potential outcomes: The collapse of the country. The transformation into a state capitalist system, as seen in China. The transformation into an authoritarian regime, as seen in North Korea. Communism is, in my opinion, a pipe dream because it proposes a classless, stateless society where the means of production are collectively owned and wealth is distributed equally among all members. However, in practice, historical attempts at implementing communism have faced challenges in terms of human nature, central planning inefficiencies, and lack of incentives, leading to economic stagnation, authoritarian rule, and often the collapse of the system. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -1 points 3 years ago Name a single country that actually implemented communism and wasn't undermined by the West with coups, sanctions, or outright invasion. Oh and the word you're looking for is "successful". "Successive" is not in any way a synonym. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago* Obviously anything that succeeds in a capitalist economy succeeded because of capitalism, and anything that succeeds in a not-fully-capitalist economy does so in spite of the corrupting influence of socialism. Remember, capitalism can't fail; it can only be failed! Slash S. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dan0@programming.dev -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) Answer my original question first and you have your proof or not. If you can't answer, there's your proof. Yeah, information was freely traded before the advent of capitalism, and you're still free to walk over to your neighbor's house and ask questions about your code, but they're not going to be near the quality of a large scale service like SO. Where do you expect the resources to come from to have and serve content reliably? They don't run on hatred of capitalism, they run on money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago* Obviously anything that succeeds in a capitalist economy succeeded because of capitalism, and anything that succeeds in a not-fully-capitalist economy does so in spite of the corrupting influence of socialism. Remember, capitalism can't fail; it can only be failed! Slash S. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dan0@programming.dev -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) Answer my original question first and you have your proof or not. If you can't answer, there's your proof. Yeah, information was freely traded before the advent of capitalism, and you're still free to walk over to your neighbor's house and ask questions about your code, but they're not going to be near the quality of a large scale service like SO. Where do you expect the resources to come from to have and serve content reliably? They don't run on hatred of capitalism, they run on money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] foo@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Stack overflow could only generate and moderate its content through collectivism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan0@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago That's true, but does your answer on SO pay the bills for running and serving the content? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dan0@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago That's true, but does your answer on SO pay the bills for running and serving the content? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rhino_hornbill@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/master/paul_cockshott_cyber_communism.md permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social -1 points 3 years ago (3 children) I have a quiz for you; Name a single successive communist country. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] RadicalKittenWanabe@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago Only if you can name a single successful capitalist country permalink fedilink source parent [–] rhino_hornbill@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Perfide@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago China is communist in name only, in practice they are the definition of State Capitalism. I also wouldn't describe a dictatorship that commits genocide as a success, in any case. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago China is successful from the capitalistic point of view, but it failed to uphold the ideals and principles of the system described in the document. The exploitation of the people is through the roof. Edit: To further explain my point: Communism is a flawed system that cannot exist in its idealistic form due to the excessive concentration of power in the state, leading to three potential outcomes: The collapse of the country. The transformation into a state capitalist system, as seen in China. The transformation into an authoritarian regime, as seen in North Korea. Communism is, in my opinion, a pipe dream because it proposes a classless, stateless society where the means of production are collectively owned and wealth is distributed equally among all members. However, in practice, historical attempts at implementing communism have faced challenges in terms of human nature, central planning inefficiencies, and lack of incentives, leading to economic stagnation, authoritarian rule, and often the collapse of the system. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -1 points 3 years ago Name a single country that actually implemented communism and wasn't undermined by the West with coups, sanctions, or outright invasion. Oh and the word you're looking for is "successful". "Successive" is not in any way a synonym. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social -1 points 3 years ago (3 children) I have a quiz for you; Name a single successive communist country. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] RadicalKittenWanabe@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago Only if you can name a single successful capitalist country permalink fedilink source parent [–] rhino_hornbill@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Perfide@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago China is communist in name only, in practice they are the definition of State Capitalism. I also wouldn't describe a dictatorship that commits genocide as a success, in any case. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago China is successful from the capitalistic point of view, but it failed to uphold the ideals and principles of the system described in the document. The exploitation of the people is through the roof. Edit: To further explain my point: Communism is a flawed system that cannot exist in its idealistic form due to the excessive concentration of power in the state, leading to three potential outcomes: The collapse of the country. The transformation into a state capitalist system, as seen in China. The transformation into an authoritarian regime, as seen in North Korea. Communism is, in my opinion, a pipe dream because it proposes a classless, stateless society where the means of production are collectively owned and wealth is distributed equally among all members. However, in practice, historical attempts at implementing communism have faced challenges in terms of human nature, central planning inefficiencies, and lack of incentives, leading to economic stagnation, authoritarian rule, and often the collapse of the system. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -1 points 3 years ago Name a single country that actually implemented communism and wasn't undermined by the West with coups, sanctions, or outright invasion. Oh and the word you're looking for is "successful". "Successive" is not in any way a synonym. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RadicalKittenWanabe@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago Only if you can name a single successful capitalist country permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rhino_hornbill@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Perfide@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago China is communist in name only, in practice they are the definition of State Capitalism. I also wouldn't describe a dictatorship that commits genocide as a success, in any case. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago China is successful from the capitalistic point of view, but it failed to uphold the ideals and principles of the system described in the document. The exploitation of the people is through the roof. Edit: To further explain my point: Communism is a flawed system that cannot exist in its idealistic form due to the excessive concentration of power in the state, leading to three potential outcomes: The collapse of the country. The transformation into a state capitalist system, as seen in China. The transformation into an authoritarian regime, as seen in North Korea. Communism is, in my opinion, a pipe dream because it proposes a classless, stateless society where the means of production are collectively owned and wealth is distributed equally among all members. However, in practice, historical attempts at implementing communism have faced challenges in terms of human nature, central planning inefficiencies, and lack of incentives, leading to economic stagnation, authoritarian rule, and often the collapse of the system. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago China is communist in name only, in practice they are the definition of State Capitalism. I also wouldn't describe a dictatorship that commits genocide as a success, in any case. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago China is successful from the capitalistic point of view, but it failed to uphold the ideals and principles of the system described in the document. The exploitation of the people is through the roof. Edit: To further explain my point: Communism is a flawed system that cannot exist in its idealistic form due to the excessive concentration of power in the state, leading to three potential outcomes: The collapse of the country. The transformation into a state capitalist system, as seen in China. The transformation into an authoritarian regime, as seen in North Korea. Communism is, in my opinion, a pipe dream because it proposes a classless, stateless society where the means of production are collectively owned and wealth is distributed equally among all members. However, in practice, historical attempts at implementing communism have faced challenges in terms of human nature, central planning inefficiencies, and lack of incentives, leading to economic stagnation, authoritarian rule, and often the collapse of the system. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -1 points 3 years ago Name a single country that actually implemented communism and wasn't undermined by the West with coups, sanctions, or outright invasion. Oh and the word you're looking for is "successful". "Successive" is not in any way a synonym. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ImpossibleRubiksCube@programming.dev -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent