you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 86 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Wait until you discover what system they used for the Apollo missions

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 64 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Internal calculations were are all done in metric, but converted to traditional US units because many of the astronauts were pilots and more used to them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    imperial system is based on metric(on wikipedia) so they calculed on metric, converted to imperial, that is basically metric but worse

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Kinda sorta not really.

    One problem with units is defining them precisely.

    For example, a meter is ostensibly "one ten-millionth of the distance from the equator to the North Pole along a great circle". That's not exactly precisely defined because the earth isn't a perfect sphere.

    So currently, a meter is defined to be the distance light travels in a vacuum in 9192631770 / 299,792,458 hyperfine structure transitions of caesium-133.

    Rather than doing the same sort of thing with updating the standard definition of a foot or pound, the US just piggybacked off the work precisely defining metric units and defined imperial in terms of metric.

    So now a foot is officially the precise distance light travels in some number of hyperfine structure transitions of caesium-133, and the US government didn't need to do a thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's not helpful. We all know what the apollo program was but where in the article does it talk about the system of measurement?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments