you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

The difference is that drug addiction can be cured. Maybe we should try rehab first. If they're not clean or OD'ed after x number of years ok maybe then. But hell let's try first.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I still don't think that answers the question:

    Why should anyone other than yourself be the arbiter of if your life should continue?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Because people under the influence of drugs don't always make choices that they won't regret when they're sober. I have personally witnessed people that wanted to die while fucked up on legally obtained prescription drugs used as directed because the side effects are just that bad. They don't feel that way once they're off that shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    No one has suggested you would just execute a person on sight while they are under the influence.

    In these situations there are interviews, evaluations and waiting periods to ensure the person is 'of sound mind' before proceeding.

    So with that cleared up, I'll repeat my question.

    Why should you get to be the arbiter of if someone else is allowed to die?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Drug addiction cannot be cured. For many, it can be successfully treated, but it’s a chronic condition which requires a lifetime of treatment. Results vary widely, as does quality of life for those with addiction.

    And nobody is saying attempts to treat a person’s addiction shouldn’t be tried first.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments