you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Primarily occupied? No. Because I never made that claim. Feel free to quote me. Since, you know, I'm the liar here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Then there is no discussion. My argument ever since your reply has been that the phenomenon that you pointed out can only happen in major cities: people working full-time but can't afford living quarters.

    Yeah, of course a homeless person without a job needs more money. I'm not referring to them because there's honestly no point to. You knew I wasn't referring to them, which is why you had to specify some of the people there were working full-time jobs.

    I'm referring to the people working jobs who feel they should get paid more while people around the world work harder for less. Those are the ones I do not take seriously.

    You, the liar that you are, posted a picture of people living in tents then said some of them have full-time jobs? How much is some? And to those some, I am specifically referring that their money would go further outside of major cities.

    Anyways. This entire argument is in bad faith. I can tell you're the kind of person who thinks more money is the solution to all working class problems. It isn't.

    Gonna block you now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments