Israel’s military has informed the United Nations that the entire population of northern Gaza should relocate to the southern half of the territory within 24 hours, the U.N. spokesman, Stéphane Dujarric, said late on Thursday night, adding that such a movement — involving over one million people — would lead to “devastating humanitarian consequences.”

“The same order applied to all U.N. staff and those sheltered in U.N. facilities — including schools, health centers and clinics,” Mr. Dujarric said.

The U.N. was told that the marker dividing the north from south was Wadi Gaza, the statement said.

The U.N. Security Council is scheduled to hold an emergency meeting on Friday afternoon in a closed consultation format

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 94 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

Someone needs to stop these vile fucks. Israel is going to kill millions if left unopposed.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It's insane how with all holocaust talk Israeli have no issues applying the same tactics. Cognative dissonance, religion and nationalism just triumphs over logic huh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yup. Who gives a fuck about lives when one side’s imaginary friend says the other’s imaginary friend is wrong

    Literally people killing each other over fairy tales.

    Oh, and because Israel stole their land.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Considering how much money both Israel and Arab worlds have you'd think the land wouldn't be much of an issue, right? Instead of building the Line UAE could literally save every single Palestinian like that.

    The thing is they both want this conflict. Israel - some dirt country in the middle of nowhere - is making so much money through this war and Intel industry that they place right there with world economies. Arab world has an enemy that distracts people from literally being slaves to the most oppresive government and religion. Nasty people all around.

    Thinking about this region is just so depressing that I'd simply ignore all news if it was practically possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is bone chilling. I haven't read a headline in a while that's struck the fear of God into me like this. They need to be talked out of it. I worry they're about to do something even worse than the Hamas attack, and that's really saying something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    I worry they’re about to do something even worse than the Hamas attack, and that’s really saying something.

    Bro they've already done that with their airstrikes actively engineered to increase, rather than decrease, civilian casualties (I can provide examples if you're curious). Now they're going full Holocaust.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -93 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Don't forget there's a lot of civilians in that 1million+ people.

    And given that the average age in Gaza is 18 with 65% being under 24, that's a lot of children as well.

    Genocide is bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I think your rationality is lost on a fascist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -37 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Genocide is bad.

    Sure I feel sorry for the civilians but I am not going to support terrorists and none of this would've happened if it weren't for Hamas

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Time and time and time again. It has been shown that moral bombing does not work. The sort of organisation that would do what Hamas did would not stop because some of their civilians get hurt or killed. Steamrolling the gaza population to get to hamas will just create an human catastrophe that will likely inspire more violence and instability in the region. As painful as it is de escalation is the right move forward.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It has been shown that moral bombing does not work.

    That's why they're invading. They spent the last 20 years using limited amounts of force to respond to Hamas' provocations. 20 years where gaza has the 1967 borders, zero settlements, zero internal checkpoints, Jews evicted at gunpoint; everything that should be required for lasting peace.

    And after all that time and effort, they get the elderly, inform, children, toddlers in peaceful communities executed en-mass. Rockets built by tearing up electric, sewage and water utilities and impoverishing it's citizens, fueled by fertilizers stolen from it's citizens, paid with money stolen from it's citizens.

    If it's not clear that an Israeli pullback to the 1967 borders won't be effective now, it never will be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    20 years where gaza has the 1967 borders, zero settlements, zero internal checkpoints, Jews evicted at gunpoint; everything that should be required for lasting peace.

    You're a fascist idiot if you sincerely believe that, but just so nobody falls for your bullshit, there was an opportunity for peace with Hamas once. It was 2012, where a ceasefire was signed, and one of its condition was the lifting of the blockade. Around that time, the West Bank government and Hamas started working towards creating a unified government and seriously pursuing peace. Everything Israel would've welcomed if it wanted peace. Well what happened?

    The Israeli government vehemently opposed the unified government, calling on Mahmoud Abbas to choose between "peace with Israel or peace with Hamas". They also didn't lift the blockade. Naturally, because people don't like being tricked, and really don't like living in open-air prisons, Hamas resumed its attacks and the whole thing fell through.

    Everything that should've been required for peace, gone to waste because Israel didn't want peace.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Everything that should've been required for peace, gone to waste because Israel didn't want peace.

    Bullshit. Realizing that Hamas was tearing up it's own infrastructure to build rockets and refusing to stop the blockade during. A period of regular rocket attacks doesn't mean it didn't wasn't peace. 2012 was the "we cease you fire" ceasefire era.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I like how you just dismissed the conclusion without addressing the reasoning. Anyway for everyone who's wondering why there isn't peace in the region, there you have it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Hamas didn't resume rocket fire. The 2012 era ceasefire is the one where they kept firing rockets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    From December 2012 to late June/early July 2014, Hamas did not fire rockets into Israel, and tried to police other groups doing so.[111] These efforts were largely successful; Netanyahu stated in March 2014 that the rocket fire in the past year was the "lowest in a decade."[29][111][112] According to Shabak, in the first half of 2014 there were 181 rocket attacks[113] compared to 55 rocket attacks in whole 2013.

    -Wikipedia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    It literally says "Hamas did not fire rockets into Israel, and tried to police other groups doing so". That's fulfilling their end of the bargain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Allowing rockets to be fired from your territory is an act of war.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Okay you're just being obnoxious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yet somehow the PLA in the much larger West Bank manages.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    They... Don't. There are resistance/terrorist organizations based out of the West bank; they just aren't as famous as Hamas. And it doesn't help that there are people who don't want peace and will actively work to disturb it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Still not the fault of the civilians nor is it justified in any way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    It sure is justified "in any way". Not being justified at all would've looked like this:

    • Palestinians do nothing
    • Israel attacks

    We all know this is not how it went down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -26 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Is giving civilians a warning to move south somehow not justified? Would you rather have them massacred with no warning?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago

    It is well known that those are the only two options. Also, the problem here is that the task is not possible, according to UN personnel, not me or you. So this feels a lot as just a way to create plausible deniability by saying "we tried hard to spare civilians".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Well yea I’m glad there was at least some sort of warning, but how do you move over 1million people in 24 hours and where? But how does telling civilians to basically leave their homes to be destroyed justified? First they cut off necessities of life now they’re telling them to get lost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Right. Killing thousands of civilians just to resolve a conflict that was escalated for some reason from both sides.

    There's only one noble side to be on in this, and that's the side of civilians and humanitarians.

    If you're ever on the side of someone who is killing civilians, your brain made a left turn somewhere and your side is probably just as valid as the extremists on the other side.

    Think about it. The only thing separating you from being the same monster you accuse those other ppl to be is being born on a different clump of earth.

  • source
  • parent