▲ 310 ▼ Based review from a Ubisoft Developer's alt account (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by oscarlavi@lemmy.world to c/baldurs_gate_3@lemmy.world 90 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Hextic@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) One reviewer that played through that and BG 1&2 said there is a lot of connections to the previous games. So it may be a sequel in every sense. Char name's saga is over. Well maybe... idk permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] DCLXVI@lemmy.world -10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) Carrying over a few story titbits makes it a sequel in every sense? Don't you expect a game's sequel to share gameplay characteristics? Baldur's Gate 3 has a completely different story along with completely different gameplay - in what sense is it a sequel. If Larian are now incapable of making a game that isn't original sin they should've refused to partner with wizards of the coats and put a "3" în the title, but neither of them seem to have any integrity. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] DCLXVI@lemmy.world -10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) Carrying over a few story titbits makes it a sequel in every sense? Don't you expect a game's sequel to share gameplay characteristics? Baldur's Gate 3 has a completely different story along with completely different gameplay - in what sense is it a sequel. If Larian are now incapable of making a game that isn't original sin they should've refused to partner with wizards of the coats and put a "3" în the title, but neither of them seem to have any integrity. permalink fedilink source parent
