▲ 479 ▼ Mia Khalifa fired from Playboy for her pro-Hamas posts after the Israel attack (www.businesstoday.in) submitted 2 years ago by vis4valentine@lemmy.ml to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world 244 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Except that's not in any way close to analogous to the situation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) well, that's totally how many people see it. That's a fact. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It might be a fact that many people see it that way, but that would just mean that many people are wrong. Many people believe all sorts of ridiculous lies and distortions of reality. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) ¯_(ツ)_/¯ You don't provide compelling arguments neither, you just say "You are wrong, I am right" I only point out that it was pretty bold tweet given the circumstances permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 1 point 2 years ago I have laid out compelling arguments based on the real world context of what's happening, what her words are most likely to mean given that context, even explained which part was misunderstood and what the most rational explanation for that was. I've done part or all of that at least a handful of times in replies throughout the comments of this post. I have also conceded that it might have been an ill-advised way of saying things because a public figure being less than 100% clear about a statement regarding anything contentious can and most often WILL open the door to misinterpretations, whether honest or wilfully manipulative. That's as close to "you are wrong, I am right" as a fiberglass canoe is to a shoddily made origami boat. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) well, that's totally how many people see it. That's a fact. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It might be a fact that many people see it that way, but that would just mean that many people are wrong. Many people believe all sorts of ridiculous lies and distortions of reality. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) ¯_(ツ)_/¯ You don't provide compelling arguments neither, you just say "You are wrong, I am right" I only point out that it was pretty bold tweet given the circumstances permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 1 point 2 years ago I have laid out compelling arguments based on the real world context of what's happening, what her words are most likely to mean given that context, even explained which part was misunderstood and what the most rational explanation for that was. I've done part or all of that at least a handful of times in replies throughout the comments of this post. I have also conceded that it might have been an ill-advised way of saying things because a public figure being less than 100% clear about a statement regarding anything contentious can and most often WILL open the door to misinterpretations, whether honest or wilfully manipulative. That's as close to "you are wrong, I am right" as a fiberglass canoe is to a shoddily made origami boat. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It might be a fact that many people see it that way, but that would just mean that many people are wrong. Many people believe all sorts of ridiculous lies and distortions of reality. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) ¯_(ツ)_/¯ You don't provide compelling arguments neither, you just say "You are wrong, I am right" I only point out that it was pretty bold tweet given the circumstances permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 1 point 2 years ago I have laid out compelling arguments based on the real world context of what's happening, what her words are most likely to mean given that context, even explained which part was misunderstood and what the most rational explanation for that was. I've done part or all of that at least a handful of times in replies throughout the comments of this post. I have also conceded that it might have been an ill-advised way of saying things because a public figure being less than 100% clear about a statement regarding anything contentious can and most often WILL open the door to misinterpretations, whether honest or wilfully manipulative. That's as close to "you are wrong, I am right" as a fiberglass canoe is to a shoddily made origami boat. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) ¯_(ツ)_/¯ You don't provide compelling arguments neither, you just say "You are wrong, I am right" I only point out that it was pretty bold tweet given the circumstances permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 1 point 2 years ago I have laid out compelling arguments based on the real world context of what's happening, what her words are most likely to mean given that context, even explained which part was misunderstood and what the most rational explanation for that was. I've done part or all of that at least a handful of times in replies throughout the comments of this post. I have also conceded that it might have been an ill-advised way of saying things because a public figure being less than 100% clear about a statement regarding anything contentious can and most often WILL open the door to misinterpretations, whether honest or wilfully manipulative. That's as close to "you are wrong, I am right" as a fiberglass canoe is to a shoddily made origami boat. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 1 point 2 years ago I have laid out compelling arguments based on the real world context of what's happening, what her words are most likely to mean given that context, even explained which part was misunderstood and what the most rational explanation for that was. I've done part or all of that at least a handful of times in replies throughout the comments of this post. I have also conceded that it might have been an ill-advised way of saying things because a public figure being less than 100% clear about a statement regarding anything contentious can and most often WILL open the door to misinterpretations, whether honest or wilfully manipulative. That's as close to "you are wrong, I am right" as a fiberglass canoe is to a shoddily made origami boat. permalink fedilink source parent