you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 days ago*

Either way, like under $2000 would have bought them the storage necessary to keep these backups on-site. They still would've needed another backup solution for redundancy purposes, but this wouldn't be the huge issue it seems to be now, where the data is sort of in limbo.

  • source
  • parent