I am just honestly confused. There seem to be no logical reason for it, except that it would raise the stock value of rocket producers like SpaceX and Blue Origin.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

They do? MS tried too, but too much issues with marine life, corrosion and accessibility for repairs/replacement. With the third also being a issue with space, but x100.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 16 hours ago (1 child)

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jun/09/worlds-first-wind-powered-underwater-datacentre-starts-operating-in-china

    Saw this awhile back and kinda rolled my eyes. I see the appeal of the idea, but the execution seems unnecessarily complicated for little gain. The space one is even worse, the sheer amount of fuel to lift that kind of weight is just a stupid waste.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 hours ago

    that the water footprint of datacentres could reach 9.3tn litres by 2030 – enough to service the annual domestic water needs of all 1.3 billion residents of sub-Saharan Africa.

    And then they wonder about the spike in climate warming, with water vapor being one of the most effective greenhouse gases.

  • source
  • parent