▲ 585 ▼ Cloudflare says humans could become a "rounding error" as bots generate 1,000 times more internet traffic (www.techspot.com) submitted 2 days ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 242 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] heh@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (5 children) Does everyone here have a wired subscription or something? It’s paywalled. No way the commenters here read the article. permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] clif@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children) You read the articles? You're supposed to immediately shitpost based on the post title. At least, that's how I learned to Lemmy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 child) If they didn't want us to shitpost based only on the title they would've provided a summary/synopsis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) AI can write that for you... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) Processing all the text as tokens is too much work, so the AI will just read the headline and the first 3 paragraphs, then hallucinate the rest of the details. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 point 1 day ago Free versions already do this. If you pay for enough tokens they can also do the real work and generate summaries better than your average human docu-drone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 2 days ago You’re supposed to immediately shitpost based on the post title This is the way. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wittymyusername@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago Crystal ball: Just a couple of months after Cloudflare revealed that bots have officially surpassed human traffic online, the company has given its view on what things will look like in five years. It's not good news for us fleshy meatsacks: non-human traffic could be up to 1,000 times higher than human traffic. CDN and cybersecurity giant Cloudflare held its Q2 earnings call on Thursday, during which chief financial officer Thomas Seifert gave a concerning prediction about what the web will look like in the future. "If the current trends continue, we think in five years, non-human traffic will be as much as 1,000 times as much as human traffic," he said. "In other words, humans will be a rounding error on the internet, not because human traffic goes down, but that's just how fast we're seeing non-human traffic grow." Seifert did add the important caveat that his predictions have been wrong in the past. Cloudflare CEO and co-founder Matthew Prince will likely be able to relate to this. He had predicted that bot traffic would surpass humans at the end of 2027, but it happened earlier this year. Also read: The Zero Click Internet It goes without saying that the sudden acceleration in non-human traffic is being driven by AI – agentic AI, specifically. Agentic systems behave very differently from traditional web crawlers and fraud bots. Their activity can closely resemble ordinary browsing, but it happens at machine speed and can be repeated on an enormous scale. Even a straightforward prompt may trigger thousands of requests. Prince illustrated the difference using online shopping: someone searching for a camera might check five retailers, while an AI agent could examine 5,000 sites on their behalf. Multiply that behavior across millions of users asking assistants to compare products and airfares, research topics, collect information, or condense articles, and you can see why Seifert believes humanity's online presence will become a rounding error. Seifert said that if traffic does grow the way he expects, "we've got to get a lot more efficient," which is where Cloudflare's services come in, of course. He also mentioned the security implications of a web made up pretty much entirely of bots. The idea that Dead Internet Theory – the concept that the internet is mostly run by bots and AI – will be demonstrably true in a few years (or now, arguably) is a concerning one. For a start, it could see the end of independent sites that have relied on the web's business model since the 1990s. There's also the fact that an internet full of bots, AI slop, and privacy risks is making more people pull away from the online world. In our poll, 97% of people said the internet today was a hellscape compared to its early days, and it looks like things are only going to get worse. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 child) This is a techspot link with no paywall for me. Did they change it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] heh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago They must have. It’s techspot now but the article title is the same. permalink fedilink source parent [–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago huh that's weird, it's not paywalled for me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] vividspecter@aussie.zone 1 point 2 days ago* A/b testing? It's not paywalled for me, although maybe the link was changed as another user mentioned. I'll add that wired links are not usually paywalled for me either. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] clif@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children) You read the articles? You're supposed to immediately shitpost based on the post title. At least, that's how I learned to Lemmy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 child) If they didn't want us to shitpost based only on the title they would've provided a summary/synopsis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) AI can write that for you... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) Processing all the text as tokens is too much work, so the AI will just read the headline and the first 3 paragraphs, then hallucinate the rest of the details. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 point 1 day ago Free versions already do this. If you pay for enough tokens they can also do the real work and generate summaries better than your average human docu-drone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 2 days ago You’re supposed to immediately shitpost based on the post title This is the way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 child) If they didn't want us to shitpost based only on the title they would've provided a summary/synopsis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) AI can write that for you... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) Processing all the text as tokens is too much work, so the AI will just read the headline and the first 3 paragraphs, then hallucinate the rest of the details. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 point 1 day ago Free versions already do this. If you pay for enough tokens they can also do the real work and generate summaries better than your average human docu-drone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) AI can write that for you... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) Processing all the text as tokens is too much work, so the AI will just read the headline and the first 3 paragraphs, then hallucinate the rest of the details. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 point 1 day ago Free versions already do this. If you pay for enough tokens they can also do the real work and generate summaries better than your average human docu-drone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) Processing all the text as tokens is too much work, so the AI will just read the headline and the first 3 paragraphs, then hallucinate the rest of the details. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 point 1 day ago Free versions already do this. If you pay for enough tokens they can also do the real work and generate summaries better than your average human docu-drone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 point 1 day ago Free versions already do this. If you pay for enough tokens they can also do the real work and generate summaries better than your average human docu-drone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 2 days ago You’re supposed to immediately shitpost based on the post title This is the way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wittymyusername@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago Crystal ball: Just a couple of months after Cloudflare revealed that bots have officially surpassed human traffic online, the company has given its view on what things will look like in five years. It's not good news for us fleshy meatsacks: non-human traffic could be up to 1,000 times higher than human traffic. CDN and cybersecurity giant Cloudflare held its Q2 earnings call on Thursday, during which chief financial officer Thomas Seifert gave a concerning prediction about what the web will look like in the future. "If the current trends continue, we think in five years, non-human traffic will be as much as 1,000 times as much as human traffic," he said. "In other words, humans will be a rounding error on the internet, not because human traffic goes down, but that's just how fast we're seeing non-human traffic grow." Seifert did add the important caveat that his predictions have been wrong in the past. Cloudflare CEO and co-founder Matthew Prince will likely be able to relate to this. He had predicted that bot traffic would surpass humans at the end of 2027, but it happened earlier this year. Also read: The Zero Click Internet It goes without saying that the sudden acceleration in non-human traffic is being driven by AI – agentic AI, specifically. Agentic systems behave very differently from traditional web crawlers and fraud bots. Their activity can closely resemble ordinary browsing, but it happens at machine speed and can be repeated on an enormous scale. Even a straightforward prompt may trigger thousands of requests. Prince illustrated the difference using online shopping: someone searching for a camera might check five retailers, while an AI agent could examine 5,000 sites on their behalf. Multiply that behavior across millions of users asking assistants to compare products and airfares, research topics, collect information, or condense articles, and you can see why Seifert believes humanity's online presence will become a rounding error. Seifert said that if traffic does grow the way he expects, "we've got to get a lot more efficient," which is where Cloudflare's services come in, of course. He also mentioned the security implications of a web made up pretty much entirely of bots. The idea that Dead Internet Theory – the concept that the internet is mostly run by bots and AI – will be demonstrably true in a few years (or now, arguably) is a concerning one. For a start, it could see the end of independent sites that have relied on the web's business model since the 1990s. There's also the fact that an internet full of bots, AI slop, and privacy risks is making more people pull away from the online world. In our poll, 97% of people said the internet today was a hellscape compared to its early days, and it looks like things are only going to get worse. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 child) This is a techspot link with no paywall for me. Did they change it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] heh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago They must have. It’s techspot now but the article title is the same. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] heh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago They must have. It’s techspot now but the article title is the same. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago huh that's weird, it's not paywalled for me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vividspecter@aussie.zone 1 point 2 days ago* A/b testing? It's not paywalled for me, although maybe the link was changed as another user mentioned. I'll add that wired links are not usually paywalled for me either. permalink fedilink source parent