this has nothing to do with an office or being opposed to nsfw because i'm opening lemmy in public. some of us just don't want to be involved with sexual stuff even if no one else is viewing my screen.

i replied to your comment because i don't agree with your expressed stance that we should let nsfw go unchecked and push away people who don't like that because they're apparently prudes. why should the onus be on people like that and not on people who don't use nsfw tags and evade blocks?

the original commenter's suggestion up top would mostly solve the issue. you disagreed with it, so i commented to disagree with your comment, and noted that i see this as a consent issue.

also i imagine moving to a sfw-only instance does nothing if the posts aren't tagged as not sfw. it's also not my goal. i don't mind having an option to unblur a nsfw post. but i find it problematic when it's effectively forced onto the timeline.