726
Ebay Could Owe $1.9 Billion in Fines for Allowing Sale of 343,000 Emissions Defeat Devices (www.thedrive.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Ebay Could Owe $1.9 Billion in Fines for Allowing Sale of 343,000 Emissions Defeat Devices::The Department of Justice alleges that eBay illegally sold 343,011 emissions defeat devices, and could face billions in penalties.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Please tell us the facts of eBay being accused of selling devices that defeat emissions tests. I'm sure we would all love to hear them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I have no clue how you think I care about that. Don't blindly trust government agencies.

    Do you think the ATF can tell the difference between a shoe string and a machine gun?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    How can we look at facts if you won't tell us what the facts are?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Just trust him bro. Govt bad, okay?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I love it because they have absolutely no alternative source for information like this. They just tell you it's wrong and to "do your own research." Which, generally, I've already done when they tell me to do that and come to the opposite conclusion they've come to.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I didn't say anyone was wrong you absolute melon. Learn to read.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You said for us to "look at the facts" and not believe the government information. So it sure sounds like you're saying that despite your insults.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago

    Then I apologize for it being confusing.

    I was saying don't trust government authorities blindly: look at the facts yourself. It's a fairly typical response to appeals to authority.

    And don't pretend you weren't being insulting because you didn't say a mean word.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I didn't make any statements about the facts. Can you read? I said don't trust three letter agencies.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Weird, it must have been some other PsychedSy who said:

    You should look at facts and not blindly trust them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Technically, a coathanger is a machine gun if you modify it to a certain configuration.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I appreciate someone that at least knows where I was going. And it's not a machine gun, you'll sure as fuck get prosecuted like it is, tho.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Legally speaking, it is a machine gun, but yes I do share your sentiment that it is not one.

    You won't get prosecuted for it though as long as you don't possess a weapon that it can fit in.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent