▲ 657 ▼ The perfect date (lemmy.world) submitted 3 days ago by PopcornPrincess@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 235 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 child) But dd-mm-yyyy is better for day to day daily life usage Uh, no. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Untamed_Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) It literally just depends to what you are used to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Yes, ISO-8601 is objectively better than YYYY/DD/MM or MM/DD/YYYY or other strange formats. But, because it isn't the most widely used format, it can be less efficient when there's no danger of MM/DD vs DD/MM confusion. If person A is talking to person B and they're from the same culture, some culture-specific version like DD/MM/YY might be easier for them because it's what they're both used to, even if it is objectively inferior. But, if person A is talking to person C who is from a different place/culture things get more challenging because if the day of the month is 12 or under, it's hard to distinguish between DD/MM or MM/DD. Even if person C knows that person A comes from a place that does DD/MM, they don't know if person C used the native DD/MM format they're used to, or translated it to them to MM/DD because person A was trying to make things easy for person C. One of the advantages of the hyphens in ISO-8601, aside from them working with files, is that hyphens in dates are less common than slashes, so if someone sees 1212-11-12 they're more likely to understand that it's an ISO-formatted date. If they see 1212/11/12 it might be a MM/DD date or a DD/MM date. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bookmeat@fedinsfw.app 1 point 1 day ago Start using it and suddenly it becomes most used. It is the little acts that make a difference. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Untamed_Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) It literally just depends to what you are used to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Yes, ISO-8601 is objectively better than YYYY/DD/MM or MM/DD/YYYY or other strange formats. But, because it isn't the most widely used format, it can be less efficient when there's no danger of MM/DD vs DD/MM confusion. If person A is talking to person B and they're from the same culture, some culture-specific version like DD/MM/YY might be easier for them because it's what they're both used to, even if it is objectively inferior. But, if person A is talking to person C who is from a different place/culture things get more challenging because if the day of the month is 12 or under, it's hard to distinguish between DD/MM or MM/DD. Even if person C knows that person A comes from a place that does DD/MM, they don't know if person C used the native DD/MM format they're used to, or translated it to them to MM/DD because person A was trying to make things easy for person C. One of the advantages of the hyphens in ISO-8601, aside from them working with files, is that hyphens in dates are less common than slashes, so if someone sees 1212-11-12 they're more likely to understand that it's an ISO-formatted date. If they see 1212/11/12 it might be a MM/DD date or a DD/MM date. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bookmeat@fedinsfw.app 1 point 1 day ago Start using it and suddenly it becomes most used. It is the little acts that make a difference. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Yes, ISO-8601 is objectively better than YYYY/DD/MM or MM/DD/YYYY or other strange formats. But, because it isn't the most widely used format, it can be less efficient when there's no danger of MM/DD vs DD/MM confusion. If person A is talking to person B and they're from the same culture, some culture-specific version like DD/MM/YY might be easier for them because it's what they're both used to, even if it is objectively inferior. But, if person A is talking to person C who is from a different place/culture things get more challenging because if the day of the month is 12 or under, it's hard to distinguish between DD/MM or MM/DD. Even if person C knows that person A comes from a place that does DD/MM, they don't know if person C used the native DD/MM format they're used to, or translated it to them to MM/DD because person A was trying to make things easy for person C. One of the advantages of the hyphens in ISO-8601, aside from them working with files, is that hyphens in dates are less common than slashes, so if someone sees 1212-11-12 they're more likely to understand that it's an ISO-formatted date. If they see 1212/11/12 it might be a MM/DD date or a DD/MM date. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bookmeat@fedinsfw.app 1 point 1 day ago Start using it and suddenly it becomes most used. It is the little acts that make a difference. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bookmeat@fedinsfw.app 1 point 1 day ago Start using it and suddenly it becomes most used. It is the little acts that make a difference. permalink fedilink source parent