▲ 188 ▼ Arch Linux AUR Under Another Wave Of Malicious Packages, Package Adoptions Halted (www.phoronix.com) submitted 2 weeks ago by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml 66 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children) What's the alternative? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) I only use official and flatpak, I wouldn't even use flatpak if official had more. Chaotic aur might be worth looking into if aur is what you want. Everything there is theoretically checked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JC1@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Are you sure about chaotic? I removed it as I thought it wasn't really checked as I read in a comment here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 weeks ago might be worth looking into I'm not sure of anything, I would look into it further were I planning on using it, which I might do in the future, Garuda KDE lite looks like a decent distro. From the little I have looked into it, it is all meant to be checked, adding an extra layer of protection, as long as your trust the people behind it (much like official I guess) permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nilz@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago Nix on Arch maybe? permalink fedilink source parent [–] perfectly_boiled_pizza@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) 😎 Debian 😎 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 week ago Not rolling release permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) I only use official and flatpak, I wouldn't even use flatpak if official had more. Chaotic aur might be worth looking into if aur is what you want. Everything there is theoretically checked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JC1@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Are you sure about chaotic? I removed it as I thought it wasn't really checked as I read in a comment here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 weeks ago might be worth looking into I'm not sure of anything, I would look into it further were I planning on using it, which I might do in the future, Garuda KDE lite looks like a decent distro. From the little I have looked into it, it is all meant to be checked, adding an extra layer of protection, as long as your trust the people behind it (much like official I guess) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JC1@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Are you sure about chaotic? I removed it as I thought it wasn't really checked as I read in a comment here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 weeks ago might be worth looking into I'm not sure of anything, I would look into it further were I planning on using it, which I might do in the future, Garuda KDE lite looks like a decent distro. From the little I have looked into it, it is all meant to be checked, adding an extra layer of protection, as long as your trust the people behind it (much like official I guess) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 weeks ago might be worth looking into I'm not sure of anything, I would look into it further were I planning on using it, which I might do in the future, Garuda KDE lite looks like a decent distro. From the little I have looked into it, it is all meant to be checked, adding an extra layer of protection, as long as your trust the people behind it (much like official I guess) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] perfectly_boiled_pizza@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) 😎 Debian 😎 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 week ago Not rolling release permalink fedilink source parent