Transcript:

Two panel meme.

Top panel: Woman in the front seat of a car screaming at a child in the rear seat. She's saying "Why can't you just shutdown?"

Bottom panel: A child screaming "A stop job is running for Session c2 of user ... (1:30 / no limit)"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 87 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Idk if this is a hot take but „no limit“ should straight up not exist. Just set a limit and blow the whole PC up when it takes too long.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    I've never see it, who sets it? I only have two processes that are like it and blth wait for 1:30

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Due to what I call some quirks (but what other people call "good, sane, excellent design decisions"), you can set a hard timeout… that can be flatly ignored by systemd for various reasons that might or might not be obvious. In that case it will happily show you <current timer> / <timeout>, then move to <current timer> / <timeout * 2>, and so on.

    Because that, for some reasons, makes a lot of sense to some people that are not me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments