https://xcancel.com/SwipeWright/status/2081789091046182975

My scholarly article "Why There Are Exactly Two Sexes" has been accessed over 50K times, placing it in the top 8 of all articles in the journal's history.

Activists refuse to cite it or acknowledge it exists.

I'm still waiting for someone to publish a scholarly scientific takedown of it. You'd think this would be a top priority for those asserting "sex is a spectrum" who believe my work is bigoted, pseudoscientific, and actively harming a vulnerable community.

Until then, you can read it and arm yourself with a thorough understanding of the 5 major frameworks that activists and activist scientists use to undermine the binary nature of the sexes and why they all fail.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-025-03348-3

One reply to his paper, Response to Wright’s (2025) “Why There Are Exactly Two Sexes”, is probably why he had to qualify takedown with "scholarly" and "scientific". Nicely put, it's neither. He published a response to that, Response to Mahr’s (2026) Response to Wright’s (2025) “Why There Are Exactly Two Sexes”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 weeks ago*

You know -maybe- if he hadn't picked a deliberately provoking title to bandwagon a social issue, maybe, people would take it serious.

But, you know, had to go with clickbait

Edit:

Mind you, that ignores the flagrant "science isn't woke" diatribe worked into it that is notacceptable in a supposedly scholarly work

  • source