▲ 703 ▼ Anon is 23 (sh.itjust.works) submitted 5 days ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works [M] to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works 298 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] mursejoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago (2 children) Trade work is admirable work. Never downplay fields that allow overtime. My best salary years are in an industry that allows unlimited OT. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] quarkquasar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children) I must be a psycho for thinking people should be paid more rather than work themselves to death. It's a cold world to live in when people think like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mursejoy@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago (2 children) I’d rather have the ability to pickup an extra shift when times are tough. I have my friends that are on a strict 40 hour week and when the check doesn’t cut it they are fucked. OT has allowed me a lot of luxuries I otherwise would have had to scrimp and save for. Meanwhile most people are fucked if their car breaks down. I just pick up an extra shift and the problem goes away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ximtor@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 days ago Thats exactly the point, if you are on a 40h week and that doesnt cut it, something is very wrong. If you say to work extra as a bonus, well maybe. But if you need it to make ends meet it's completely fucked imo. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wittymyusername@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 days ago I’d rather times not be tough, but it seems that’s no longer allowed. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago It can be both, can't it? People should be paid a living wage. If you do more work than is the defined norm you should be paid increasingly more sums of money. The intent of overtime laws was to encourage companies to hire someone else instead of making someone work 80 hours a week. A business saying that they'll pay you more if you work more at your discretion doesn't bother me. Even with a perfectly good wage and benefits you're going to have cases where people want a touch more more money. I had a coworker who did contracting jobs to pay for a new deck. He didn't have to, but it kept his budget from getting weird. permalink fedilink source parent [–] benderbeerman@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) I worked 3300 hours a few years back. I was not prepared for what the overtime would do to my taxes. Still brought home more than I ever had before (or since). Also was not prepared what the overtime would do to my personal life or my mind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mursejoy@lemmy.zip 1 point 4 days ago Yup two years ago I worked just over 3500 hours. I basically lived at work to help put my wife through college and hold down the fort. It was very difficult but worth it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] quarkquasar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children) I must be a psycho for thinking people should be paid more rather than work themselves to death. It's a cold world to live in when people think like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mursejoy@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago (2 children) I’d rather have the ability to pickup an extra shift when times are tough. I have my friends that are on a strict 40 hour week and when the check doesn’t cut it they are fucked. OT has allowed me a lot of luxuries I otherwise would have had to scrimp and save for. Meanwhile most people are fucked if their car breaks down. I just pick up an extra shift and the problem goes away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ximtor@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 days ago Thats exactly the point, if you are on a 40h week and that doesnt cut it, something is very wrong. If you say to work extra as a bonus, well maybe. But if you need it to make ends meet it's completely fucked imo. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wittymyusername@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 days ago I’d rather times not be tough, but it seems that’s no longer allowed. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago It can be both, can't it? People should be paid a living wage. If you do more work than is the defined norm you should be paid increasingly more sums of money. The intent of overtime laws was to encourage companies to hire someone else instead of making someone work 80 hours a week. A business saying that they'll pay you more if you work more at your discretion doesn't bother me. Even with a perfectly good wage and benefits you're going to have cases where people want a touch more more money. I had a coworker who did contracting jobs to pay for a new deck. He didn't have to, but it kept his budget from getting weird. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mursejoy@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago (2 children) I’d rather have the ability to pickup an extra shift when times are tough. I have my friends that are on a strict 40 hour week and when the check doesn’t cut it they are fucked. OT has allowed me a lot of luxuries I otherwise would have had to scrimp and save for. Meanwhile most people are fucked if their car breaks down. I just pick up an extra shift and the problem goes away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ximtor@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 days ago Thats exactly the point, if you are on a 40h week and that doesnt cut it, something is very wrong. If you say to work extra as a bonus, well maybe. But if you need it to make ends meet it's completely fucked imo. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wittymyusername@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 days ago I’d rather times not be tough, but it seems that’s no longer allowed. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ximtor@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 days ago Thats exactly the point, if you are on a 40h week and that doesnt cut it, something is very wrong. If you say to work extra as a bonus, well maybe. But if you need it to make ends meet it's completely fucked imo. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wittymyusername@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 days ago I’d rather times not be tough, but it seems that’s no longer allowed. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago It can be both, can't it? People should be paid a living wage. If you do more work than is the defined norm you should be paid increasingly more sums of money. The intent of overtime laws was to encourage companies to hire someone else instead of making someone work 80 hours a week. A business saying that they'll pay you more if you work more at your discretion doesn't bother me. Even with a perfectly good wage and benefits you're going to have cases where people want a touch more more money. I had a coworker who did contracting jobs to pay for a new deck. He didn't have to, but it kept his budget from getting weird. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] benderbeerman@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) I worked 3300 hours a few years back. I was not prepared for what the overtime would do to my taxes. Still brought home more than I ever had before (or since). Also was not prepared what the overtime would do to my personal life or my mind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mursejoy@lemmy.zip 1 point 4 days ago Yup two years ago I worked just over 3500 hours. I basically lived at work to help put my wife through college and hold down the fort. It was very difficult but worth it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mursejoy@lemmy.zip 1 point 4 days ago Yup two years ago I worked just over 3500 hours. I basically lived at work to help put my wife through college and hold down the fort. It was very difficult but worth it. permalink fedilink source parent