wrote CLI in C++ to sort files. it's very simple, just download and use. if you a photographer, video editor or just need to sort some files, you welcome (link in post)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't think it is at all clear what this does.

It sorts files how?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    It doesn't sort them in the programming sense, it's just moving files to another directory based on the filename

    qsort -w /home/user/Documents -t ext --df .txt
    

    is equivalent to

    ls *.txt | xargs -I {} mv {} /home/user/Documents
    
    
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Btw, you should not pipe ls. It's unsafe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    ls can be piped safely if you use --zero:

    ls --zero *.txt | xargs --null -I {} mv {} /home/user/Documents
    

    While the above is a pretty silly example, one reason why you might want to do this is that xargs has a -P/--max-procs argument, that runs N commands in parallel. So you could do something like the following to gzip four files in parallel:

    ls --zero *.txt | xargs --null -n1 -P4 gzip
    

    This is a bit simpler than using the equivalent

    find . -maxdepth 1 -name '*.txt' -print0 | xargs --null -n1 -P4 gzip
    
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    While the later is more reliably available. Use this in scripts you distribute. And also finds -exec instead of |xargs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    Both find and xargs are POSIX commands, so there's something wrong with your OS if you are missing either, and find does not have an equivalent of -P. Granted, -P is an extension, but it is supported by GNU's, OpenBSD's, FreeBSD's, and BusyBox's xargs commands, and probably also by others, so it is reasonable to assume that it is available unless you are targeting some obscure OS

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Source? I tried searching for it and found nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    I think the other user meant that ls output is not supposed to be treated as parsable, because the tool doesn't offer any guarantees in that regards.

    Shells have built-in support for globbing files anyway. xargs is also not needed. If someone is allergic to using a shell for loop, find always had -exec with ; instead + which wouldn't trip on too many arguments.

  • source
  • parent