you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 day ago (1 child)

Your reading comprehension through all of this has been abysmal, possible explanations have been given by me and others and you are still sea-lioning.

They probably realized their cost outlay is lower than they anticipated and they are passing those savings on to the consumer.

Others have suggested they are absorbing those discounts in non essential items.

You can disagree with these explanations, but you instead keep sidestepping them and choosing to pretend your question wasn't answered.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Asking a question is not sealioning. I don't even think you know what that word means. No one has answered the question. Yourself included.

    You provided a flawed explanation, which I then explained to you. Instead of providing some sort of counterargument, you then go on the offensive and blame me for it. It seems like you're just offended that anyone wouldn't just accept what you say and not ask questions.

    They probably realized their cost outlay is lower than they anticipated and they are passing those savings on to the consumer.

    This is not an explanation, this is speculation, as denoted by the word "probably".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    Congrats on actually addressing an answer. I have hope for you. Maybe go back to the person you claimed never answered you, with your response to them as well.

    Any answer any of us give is going to be speculation, we don't have their financials in front of us. If you want more than speculation your best option is to research the topic yourself or go to New York and foia request the grocery store financials. No one on Lemmy is going to do that for you just because you asked a question. People are going to respond what they think while they take a shit and go about their day.

    This is not an explanation, this is speculation, as denoted by the word "probably".

    A speculative explanation is still an explanation. We are not obligated to give an academic response to a half asses question to a person too mentally lazy to research their own question. If this is so important to you, that you will attempt to annoy dozens of commenters and readers on the internet, you could have used that time to try to answer that question yourself if you need a thorough accounting of their financial outlay. No one here will do that for you just because you are, "just asking questions".

    You can try to annoy me all you want though, I enjoy responding to people looking for pointless arguments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    Any answer any of us give is going to be speculation

    Actually not correct at all. Someone did come and actually provide a factual answer. You could learn something from them.

    No one on Lemmy is going to do that for you just because you asked a question.

    They did though. Because that's precisely what forums like this are for.

    A speculative explanation is still an explanation.

    Wrong again.

    We are not obligated to give an academic response

    You're not obligated to give me anything. And yet here you are, making up answers that don't even answer the question I asked. If you don't have an answer, just keep scrolling.

    I enjoy responding to people looking for pointless arguments.

    Sorry to disappoint. Will have to look elsewhere.

  • source
  • parent