you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The US currently spends about $5 trillion on healthcare. About $1T of that goes through Medicare, another $0.9T through Medicaid, which leaves about $3T. Non-government spending is $1.6T through private insurance, $0.6T out of pocket, and $0.5T charities.

The "universal healthcare would be cheaper argument," which I believe, is based on shifting that $3T of private payments into government spending and bringing the ~85% efficiency of care by private insurers up to the 98% that Medicare claims. i.e.: eliminating roughly $400 B of insurance company profit. That still requires $2.5T revenue increase, which is about 50% of current revenue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    You're operating under the assumption that the US Government would pay the same prices that they currently pay via medicaid and medicare as well as the same prices that private pays. That's not the case. Generally, the US Citizens pay double or more than what citizens in other developed nations pay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Docs in the rest of the world don't start with $200k student loans, and nurses don't start $50k in debt. US medicare for all won't magically give us Swedish hospital rates.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 21 hours ago (1 child)

    I geniunly wonder what the total cost looks like. Like does it cost sweden 200k to train a doctor?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 12 hours ago

    Agree. I'd love to see someone do a rigorous accounting of any degree program, especially with international comparisions. I once went through a couple of US state universities, and that generally supported the hypothesis of 'cost of instruction hasn't changed in 50 years, but burden of payment has shifted from state taxes to tuition,' but that was based on whatever the schools published as 'cost of instruction.' I'd believe that international cost of instruction follows purchasing price pairity, and it seems more expensive in the US because it's all tuition and no public payment.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)