you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 day ago

You have conflated "free to the public" and working for free into the argument.

Yes it should be free to the public. But that requires a taxpayer funded journalism.

The workers who are already underpaid should not be required to work for free because their work is important. That's incredibly regressive.

  • source
  • parent